Many people think that youngsters ought to outlay of their spare time with family members; however, there are those suppose that is ineffective.
On the one hand, it may appear advisable for parents to act as role models and to establish ground rules to children for behaviour by spending their free time as long as possible with their children. This allows children to absorb conventions and codes of conduct which they can follow themselves and could lead to an absence of problems such as bullying, truancy, and delinquency later on. Moreover, being with family should reduce the risk of children falling victim to crimes such as abduction, or the influence of negative peer pressure.
On the other hand, in a society where many families have dual-income parents or where one parent role as breadwinner means she /he is away from family, it is inevitable that children cannot spend all of their spare time with the family for long periods. Child-minding and after-school childcare are often used in these cases. Thereby, if it's managed properly, these can be perfectly viable alternatives for some parents. Equally, it seems that children could learn a considerable amount from peers, and allowing them to play without direct supervision may be a benefit.
In conclusion, I am firmly convinced that while family time is essential for bonding and absorbing patterns of behaviour there are definite advantages when children outside of the family too. This is provided that they are in a safe and well-behaved environment with peers who are themselves reasonable brought-up.
Many
people
think
that youngsters ought to outlay of their spare
time
with
family
members;
however
, there are those suppose
that is
ineffective.
On the one hand, it may appear advisable for
parents
to act as role models and to establish ground
rules
to
children
for
behaviour
by spending their free
time
as long as possible with their
children
. This
allows
children
to absorb conventions and codes of conduct which they can follow themselves and could lead to an absence of problems such as bullying, truancy, and delinquency later on.
Moreover
, being with
family
should
reduce
the
risk
of
children
falling victim to crimes such as abduction, or the influence of
negative
peer pressure.
On the other hand
, in a society where
many
families
have dual-income
parents
or where one
parent
role as breadwinner means she /he is away from
family
, it is inevitable that
children
cannot spend all of their spare
time
with the
family
for long periods. Child-minding and after-school childcare are
often
used
in these cases. Thereby, if it's managed
properly
, these can be
perfectly
viable alternatives for
some
parents
.
Equally
, it seems that
children
could learn a considerable amount from peers, and allowing them to play without direct supervision may be a benefit.
In conclusion
, I am
firmly
convinced that while
family
time
is essential for bonding and absorbing patterns of
behaviour
there are
definite
advantages when
children
outside of
the
family
too. This
is provided
that they are in a safe and well-behaved environment with peers who are themselves reasonable brought-up.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
7Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
7Mistakes