The lucrative payments of the employees are debated with one opinion favouring this in consideration of its benefits for the state, while others say that the authorities ought to enforce some limits on the salaries. Professional growth and institutional efficacy are the main points which support this practice, but economic burden and social disparities are the points against this. This essay will outline both the views first followed by my opinion.
On the one hand, the heavy pay packages are argued, firstly, because they are greater incentives which increase the skilled individuals. For example, for an executive post in the NIH, 35 applicants were the professors with over 20 years of experience. The well paid slots are charming for the candidates, hence increasing their applicants, which tends to raise the required qualifications and experiences. Consequently, the individuals keep on improving their skills and knowledge required for the posts. Therefore, a large number of people qualifying such works are readily available. As the high salaries raise skills, so should be continued. Secondly, the institutions are also benefiting, as they get highly motivated and groomed workers. This leads to the progress and efficient working. Both of the above mentioned advantages ultimately help the country as it depends on its individuals and the departments for its prosperity.
On the other hand, large payments are opposed on account of increasing burden. Such attractive packages are a heavy over the national funds, causing a further aggravation of the budget deficits. In addition, the social class difference further deepens. Resultantly, the nation has to suffer in the form of raising taxes and communal differences. For instance, the Pakistan railways show an annual monetary deficit of Pkr 10 billion and its managers enjoy pays in millions of rupees. With these points, people suggest a curb on paying.
In my opinion, the advantages are overwhelmingly great, although, we must keep such bonuses for the departments where experts are difficult to find.
In conclusion, greater amounts paid to the employees help in the professional build up and the efficacy of the departments, although at the expense of the monetary drawbacks and social rifts. I think, the selective application of this approach is essential for a state and its natives.
The lucrative payments of the employees
are debated
with one opinion
favouring
this in consideration of its benefits for the state, while others say that the authorities ought to enforce
some
limits on the salaries. Professional growth and institutional efficacy are the main points which support this practice,
but
economic burden and social disparities are the points against this. This essay will outline both the views
first
followed by my opinion.
On the one hand, the heavy pay packages
are argued
,
firstly
,
because
they are greater incentives which increase the skilled individuals.
For example
, for an executive post in the NIH, 35 applicants were the professors with over 20 years of experience. The well paid slots are charming for the candidates,
hence
increasing their applicants, which tends to raise the required qualifications and experiences.
Consequently
, the individuals
keep
on improving their
skills
and knowledge required for the posts.
Therefore
,
a large number of
people
qualifying such works are
readily
available. As the high salaries raise
skills
,
so
should
be continued
.
Secondly
, the institutions are
also
benefiting, as they
get
highly
motivated and groomed workers. This leads to the progress and efficient working. Both of the above mentioned advantages
ultimately
help
the country as it depends on its individuals and the departments for its prosperity.
On the other hand
, large payments
are opposed
on account of increasing burden. Such attractive packages are a heavy over the national funds, causing a
further
aggravation of the budget deficits.
In addition
, the social
class
difference
further
deepens.
Resultantly
, the nation
has to
suffer in the form of raising taxes and communal differences.
For instance
, the Pakistan railways
show
an annual monetary deficit of
Pkr
10 billion and its managers enjoy pays in millions of rupees. With these points,
people
suggest a curb on paying.
In my opinion, the advantages are
overwhelmingly
great, although, we
must
keep
such bonuses for the departments where experts are difficult to find.
In conclusion
, greater amounts paid to the employees
help
in the professional build up and the efficacy of the departments, although at the expense of the monetary drawbacks and social rifts. I
think
, the selective application of this approach is essential for a state and its natives.