Many people today are taking advantage of the environmental and health benefits of using bicycles as a primary means of transportation. I am largely in agreement with this practice, despite potential safety concerns.
Critics often point out that cycling can be dangerous. This conclusion is based on numerous studies showing the fatality and serious injury rates for accidents involving bicycles are considerably higher than for most other vehicles. Even if a cyclist is wearing a helmet, the rest of their body is completely unprotected and bikes themselves do not stand up well to collisions. Added to this are the driving conditions in most major cities, where there might not be bike lanes or cars and motorbikes may not respect cyclists’ right of way. The cyclists themselves contribute to the danger if they are overconfident and try to keep up with or pass motorised vehicles.
Nonetheless, the marginally increased risks involved in cycling do not outweigh its environmental and health benefit. Bikes are a modern, clean form of transportation because they do not burn any fossil fuels or require intensive industrial production methods for their manufacturing. This is the main reason many forward-looking, environmentally-conscious cities now encourage biking to work with bike lanes and bike-sharing schemes. The second advantage is health. Cycling is great cardiovascular exercise at a time when lifestyles are becoming increasingly sedentary due to advances in consumer technology. Riding a bicycle allows the average person to get in their daily exercise efficiently on their way to work.
In conclusion, bikes may increase the odds of serious injury, but these exceptions are dwarfed by health and environmental prerogatives. Cities should therefore enact laws to help cycling flourish.
Many
people
today
are taking advantage of the environmental and
health
benefits of using bicycles as a primary means of transportation. I am
largely
in agreement with this practice, despite potential safety concerns.
Critics
often
point out that
cycling
can be
dangerous
. This conclusion
is based
on numerous studies showing the fatality and serious injury rates for accidents involving bicycles are
considerably
higher than for most other vehicles. Even if a cyclist is wearing a helmet, the rest of their body is completely unprotected and
bikes
themselves do not stand up well to collisions.
Added
to this are the driving conditions in most major cities, where there might not be
bike
lanes or cars and motorbikes may not respect cyclists’ right of way. The cyclists themselves contribute to the
danger
if they are overconfident and try to
keep
up with or pass
motorised
vehicles.
Nonetheless, the
marginally
increased
risks
involved in
cycling
do not outweigh its environmental and
health
benefit.
Bikes
are a modern, clean form of transportation
because
they do not burn any fossil fuels or require intensive industrial production methods for their manufacturing. This is the main reason
many
forward-looking,
environmentally
-conscious cities
now
encourage biking to work with
bike
lanes and bike-sharing schemes. The second advantage is
health
.
Cycling
is great cardiovascular exercise at a time when lifestyles are becoming
increasingly
sedentary due to advances in consumer technology. Riding a bicycle
allows
the average person to
get
in their daily exercise
efficiently
on their way to work.
In conclusion
,
bikes
may increase the odds of serious injury,
but
these exceptions
are dwarfed
by
health
and environmental prerogatives. Cities should
therefore
enact laws to
help
cycling
flourish.