Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The two pie charts show about the main energy source in usa in year 1980amd 1990

The two pie charts show about the main energy source in usa in year 1980amd 1990 kxQ3W

The information regarding the utilisation of five energy sources in USA in the years 1980 and 1990 is represented by the supplied pie charts Having an overview, it is crystal clear that oil was the major source consumed in both years; However, the use of nuclear power was doubled in just ten years. After having myopic observation it is identified that in 1990, oil was the main source used for producing energy, value was accounted at 42%, which in 1990 dropped down and made nearly one third out of total proportion. On the other hand, a negligible difference of 1% can be seen in terms of natural gas used for energy generation, value was 26% in 1980 and 25% in 1990 On further analysis, 22% of energy was manufactured by coal in 1980, which ballooned to 27%. in year 1990. Likewise, the energy produced by nuclear power in 1980 was two fold of the energy generated by same source in 1990, value was nearly 5%. Moreover, a huge similarity can be seen among hydroelectric power, the percentum was 5% in 1980 and 1990 respectively.

The information regarding the Possible spelling mistake. 'utilisation' is British English.utilization
utilisation
 of five You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
sources
A determiner is probably missing here: "in the USA".in the USA
in USA
 in the years 1980 and 1990 is represented
 by the supplied pie charts

Having an overview, it is crystal This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 that oil was the major You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
source
 consumed in both years; However
, the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 of nuclear power was doubled
 in This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 ten years.

After having myopic observation it is identified
 that in 1990, oil was the main You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
source
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 for producing You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
, value was accounted
 at 42%, which in 1990 This phrase is redundant. Consider using "dropped".dropped
dropped down
 and made nearly
 one third out of total proportion. On the other hand
, a negligible difference of 1% can be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
seen
 in terms of natural gas This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploited
used
 for You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 generation, value was 26% in 1980 and 25% in 1990

On further
 analysis, 22% of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
was manufactured
 by coal in 1980, which ballooned to 27%. This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterIn
in
 year 1990. Likewise
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 produced by nuclear power in 1980 was The adjective or adverb 'twofold' needs to be written as one word.twofold
two fold
 of the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withstrengthtoughnesspowervitalitystaminaefficiency
energy
 generated by same You use this word too often, consider replacing it withorigincauseauthorityexpert
source
 in 1990, value was nearly
 5%. Moreover
, a huge similarity can be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
seen
 among hydroelectric power, the Possible spelling mistake found.percent um
percentum
 was 5% in 1980 and 1990 respectively
. 