Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The two column charts show the percentage of food and other items bought by 3 European countries in 1998 and 2008 v.2

The two column charts show the percentage of food and other items bought by 3 European countries in 1998 and 2008 v. 2
The given charts demonstrate the expense people in 3 Europe nations spent in foods and other goods between 1998 and 2008. It is evident that people in Norway spent bought the largest percent of food while Poland residents mostly bought other items. UK was the coutries where people bought the least food and other items. In term of food, in 1998, Norway bought the biggest propotion of food, at exactly 15%, followed by Poland where nearly 8% of food was bought. UK was the nations that people only bought 5% of food. After 10 - year period, the percentage of food bought by 3 countries increased. The food bought by Norway and Poland was triple, at aroung 45% and 30% respectively. Although the proportion of food in UK rose five fold, at 25% but UK was a country that bought the smallest number of food. On the other hand, in 1998, Poland citizens bought the largest number of other items, which was 35%. This number in Norway and UK was only 7% and 3% respectively. In 2008, the percentage of other items bought in Poland reached 35%, followed by Norway at 15% and UK at 18%.
The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
charts demonstrate the expense
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
in 3 Europe nations spent in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
foods
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
goods
between 1998 and 2008.

It is evident that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
in Norway spent
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
bought
the largest percent of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
while Poland residents
mostly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
bought
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
items. UK was the
Possible spelling mistake found.
coutries
where
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
bought
the least
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
items.

In term of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
, in 1998, Norway
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
bought
the biggest
Possible spelling mistake found.
propotion
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
, at exactly 15%, followed by Poland where
nearly
8% of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
was
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
bought
. UK was the nations that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
bought
5% of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
. After 10
Consider using an m-dash if you do not want to join two words.
-
year period, the percentage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
bought
by 3 countries increased. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
bought
by Norway and Poland was triple, at
Possible spelling mistake found.
aroung
45% and 30%
respectively
. Although the proportion of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
food
in UK rose five
Possible agreement error. The noun 'fold' seems to be countable, so consider using: "folds".
fold
, at 25%
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
UK was a country that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
bought
the smallest number of food.

On the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
hand, in 1998, Poland citizens
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
bought
the largest number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
items, which was 35%. This number in Norway and UK was
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
7% and 3%
respectively
. In 2008, the percentage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
other
items
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
bought
in Poland reached 35%, followed by Norway at 15% and UK at 18%.
1Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
20Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
5Mistakes

IELTS academic The two column charts show the percentage of food and other items bought by 3 European countries in 1998 and 2008 v. 2

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
196 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts