Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The table shows the change in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The table shows the change in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007. k6rne
The given table illustrates the variation in a number of household types in Great Britain between the years 1971 and 2007. Overall, the percentage of people in houses for one person increased considerably from the years 1971 to 2007. Additionally, for one-family homes, couple to be precise, the percentiles of people with no children and lone parents kept escalating from 1971 to 2001. Meanwhile, percentages of couples with dependent children and non-dependent children slightly decreased. It is clear from the table that the house kinds for one person and lone parent share the same percentage of 12% in the years 2001 to 2007. Moreover, the number of people remained unchanged in one person houses of 12%, couples without children of 25% (exactly a quarter), non-dependent children of 9% and lone parent of 12% from 2001 to 2007. Besides, the largest change in the percentages occurred for dependent children which dramatically declined from 52% to 36% between 1971 and 2007, experiencing a reduction of 16%. Finally, the smallest change was for one person household which experienced a slight increase of 6% from 1971 to 2007.
The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
table illustrates the variation in a number of household types in Great Britain between the years 1971 and 2007.

Overall
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
in
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
houses
for one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
increased
considerably
from the years 1971 to 2007.
Additionally
, for one-family homes, couple to be precise, the percentiles of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
with no
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
and lone parents
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
kept
escalating from 1971 to 2001. Meanwhile,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentages
of couples with dependent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
and non-dependent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
slightly
decreased.

It is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
from the table that the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
house
kinds for one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
and lone parent share the same
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of 12% in the years 2001 to 2007.
Moreover
, the number of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
remained unchanged in one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
houses
of 12%, couples without
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
of 25% (exactly a quarter), non-dependent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
of 9% and lone parent of 12% from 2001 to 2007.
Besides
, the largest
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentages
occurred for dependent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
which
dramatically
declined from 52% to 36% between 1971 and 2007, experiencing a reduction of 16%.
Finally
, the smallest
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
was for one
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
household which experienced a slight increase of 6% from 1971 to 2007.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The table shows the change in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007.

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
184 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The table shows the change in some household types in Great Britain from 1971 to 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.