Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The table shows the amount of total waste produced in million tonnes in six different countries in three years. v.1

The table shows the amount of total waste produced in million tonnes in six different countries in three years. v. 1
The table compares the waste production in six different countries in three different years. Overall, the US alone produced more waste in these years than the rest of the countries did in combination. According to the table data, Canada produced 20 million tonnes of litter which was exactly double than that of Ireland and Poland. The waste production in Japan was 15 million tonnes. Scotland produced the least amount of garbage which was only 3 million tonnes. These five countries together were responsible for producing 58 million tonnes of wastage which was almost half of the waste products in the USA. Next year the waste generation in the US increased to 150 million tonnes, almost a fifty percent increase, while Poland, Canada and Scotland managed to reduce it. The most significant improvement was in Poland in terms of waste production - from 10 to below 3 million tonnes in 4 years. Finally, in 2000, waste production in Ireland, Poland, Japan, Canada and Scotland was 9. 9, 18, 25, 29 and 5 million tonnes respectively and it is obvious that all these countries have been successful to check their waste production. However, the USA in this year generated more than 200 million tonnes of leftovers while the rest of countries together produced less than 87 million tonnes of waste.
The table compares the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
in six
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
in three
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
years.
Overall
, the US alone
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
produced
more
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
in these years than the rest of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
did in combination.

According to the table data, Canada
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
produced
20
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes of litter which was exactly double than that of Ireland and Poland. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
in Japan was 15
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes. Scotland
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
produced
the least amount of garbage which was
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
3
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes. These five
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
together were responsible for producing 58
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes of wastage which was almost half of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
products in the USA.
Next
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
generation in the US increased to 150
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes, almost a fifty percent increase, while Poland, Canada and Scotland managed to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
it. The most significant improvement was in Poland in terms of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
Consider using an m-dash if you do not want to join two words.
-
from 10 to below 3
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes in 4 years.
Finally
, in 2000,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
in Ireland, Poland, Japan, Canada and Scotland was 9. 9, 18, 25, 29 and 5
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes
respectively
and it is obvious that all these
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
have been successful to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
check
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
.
However
, the USA in this
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
generated more than 200
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes of leftovers while the rest of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
together
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
produced
less than 87
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
.
4Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
34Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes

IELTS academic The table shows the amount of total waste produced in million tonnes in six different countries in three years. v. 1

Academic
  American English
2 paragraphs
218 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts