Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The table illustrates the poverty rates among six different types of households in Australia in the year 1991.

The table illustrates the poverty rates among six different types of households in Australia in the year 1991. r8BRn
The table illustrates the poverty rates among six different types of households in Australia in the year 1991. Generally speaking, 11% of the citizens were living in poverty, the number accounted for 1, 837, 000 in 1991. Among them, single parents had the highest percentage. According to the details in the table, the poverty rates of single people were higher than couples'. The single parents had the largest portion among the whole categories(21%), but only 12% of couples who have children were living in poverty. The same pattern can be seen among the people with no children, with 19% of single people were living below the poverty line, while the portion for couples was much lower, at only 7%. Similarly, 6% of single aged citizens were poor, while the poverty elderly couples only accounted for 4%. Besides that, people with children were more likely to be financially limited. It is noticeable that the portion of couples who have children (12%) was higher obviously than the rates for citizens without children (7%).
The table illustrates the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
rates among six
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
types of households in Australia in the year 1991.

Generally
speaking, 11% of the citizens were living in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
, the number accounted for 1, 837, 000 in 1991. Among them,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
single
parents had the highest percentage.

According to the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
details
in the table, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
rates of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
single
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
were higher than couples'. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
single
parents had the largest portion among the whole categories(21%),
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
12% of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couples
who have
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
were living in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
. The same pattern can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
among the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
with no
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
, with 19% of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
single
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
were living below the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
line, while the portion for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couples
was much lower, at
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
7%.
Similarly
, 6% of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
single
aged citizens were poor, while the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
elderly
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couples
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
accounted for 4%.

Besides
that,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
were more likely to be
financially
limited. It is noticeable that the portion of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couples
who have
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
(12%) was higher
obviously
than the rates for citizens without
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
(7%).
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The table illustrates the poverty rates among six different types of households in Australia in the year 1991.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
171 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The table illustrates the poverty rates among six different types of households in Australia in the year 1991.