Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The table illustrates the data about the results of surveys in various years (2000,2005 and 2010) at a university .

The table illustrates the data about the results of surveys in various years (2000, 2005 and 2010) at a university. OlopN
The table illustrates the data about the results of surveys in various years (2000, 2005 and 2010) at a university. The unit is shown in percentage. Overall, in each year, “print Resources” got the highest ratings from students, whereas this figure was the lowest for “Range of modules offered”. There were fluctuations for other aspects of university. With regard to the votes, over the given period the figure for “technique quality” and “Print Resources” fluctuated, such that according to the first aspect, with 5 years apart, it constituted 65%, 63% and 69%, whereas the second one composed 84%, 89% and 88%. As per “Electronic Resources”, the ratio of ratings increased moderately and accounted for 45%, 72% and 88% respectively in each shown year. Nevertheless, the preference if “range of modules offered” declined dramatically and comprised considerably 32%, 30% and 27% in 2000, 2005 and 2010. However, the percentage of votes of students for “building and teaching facilities” remained the same over the years and eventually made up 77%.
The table illustrates the data about the results of surveys in various years (2000, 2005 and 2010) at a university. The unit
is shown
in percentage.

Overall
, in each
year
, “print Resources”
got
the highest ratings from students, whereas this figure was the lowest for “Range of modules offered”. There were fluctuations for other aspects of university.

With regard to the votes, over the
given
period the figure for “technique quality” and “Print Resources” fluctuated, such that according to the
first
aspect, with 5 years apart, it constituted 65%, 63% and 69%, whereas the second one composed 84%, 89% and 88%. As per “Electronic Resources”, the ratio of ratings increased
moderately
and accounted for 45%, 72% and 88%
respectively
in each shown
year
.
Nevertheless
, the preference if “range of modules offered” declined
dramatically
and comprised
considerably
32%, 30% and 27% in 2000, 2005 and 2010.
However
, the percentage of votes of students for “building and teaching facilities” remained the same over the years and
eventually
made up 77%.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The table illustrates the data about the results of surveys in various years (2000, 2005 and 2010) at a university.

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
168 words
7.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts