The table illustrates the data about the results of surveys in various years (2000,2005 and 2010) at a university .
The table illustrates the data about the results of surveys in various years (2000, 2005 and 2010) at a university. OlopN
The table illustrates the data about the results of surveys in various years (2000, 2005 and 2010) at a university. The unit is shown in percentage.
Overall, in each year, “print Resources” got the highest ratings from students, whereas this figure was the lowest for “Range of modules offered”. There were fluctuations for other aspects of university.
With regard to the votes, over the given period the figure for “technique quality” and “Print Resources” fluctuated, such that according to the first aspect, with 5 years apart, it constituted 65%, 63% and 69%, whereas the second one composed 84%, 89% and 88%. As per “Electronic Resources”, the ratio of ratings increased moderately and accounted for 45%, 72% and 88% respectively in each shown year. Nevertheless, the preference if “range of modules offered” declined dramatically and comprised considerably 32%, 30% and 27% in 2000, 2005 and 2010. However, the percentage of votes of students for “building and teaching facilities” remained the same over the years and eventually made up 77%.
The table illustrates the data about the results of surveys in various years (2000, 2005 and 2010) at a university. The unit
is shown
in percentage.
Overall
, in each
year
, “print Resources”
got
the highest ratings from students, whereas this figure was the lowest for “Range of modules offered”. There were fluctuations for other aspects of university.
With regard to the votes, over the
given
period the figure for “technique quality” and “Print Resources” fluctuated, such that according to the
first
aspect, with 5 years apart, it constituted 65%, 63% and 69%, whereas the second one composed 84%, 89% and 88%. As per “Electronic Resources”, the ratio of ratings increased
moderately
and accounted for 45%, 72% and 88%
respectively
in each shown
year
.
Nevertheless
, the preference if “range of modules offered” declined
dramatically
and comprised
considerably
32%, 30% and 27% in 2000, 2005 and 2010.
However
, the percentage of votes of students for “building and teaching facilities” remained the same over the years and
eventually
made up 77%.