The table describes in thousands the estimated and actual numbers of houses built in the UK by region in 2002. v.2
The table describes in thousands the estimated and actual numbers of houses built in the UK by region in 2002. v. 2
The diagram depicts the actual and estimated numbers of houses built in the UK by seven regions in 2002.
Overall, it is clear that depending on particular regions, significant differences were seen between actual and estimated numbers. However, in most cases, the expected number was below the number of houses which were built.
To be more precise, the highest numbers of houses were constructed in Southern England (77, 500), London (47, 800), and in Central England (16, 200), far exceeding the estimates of 51, 100, 24, 800 and 8, 100 respectively. Similarly, in the North of England, there was a disparity just over 4, 000 between these figures, 9, 300 houses for the estimated figure against 13, 500 for the actual one. Besides, Northern Ireland and Wales followed the same trend, 2, 500 houses as compared to 5, 500, and 2, 900 opposed to 6, 300.
Strikingly, only in Scotland that the number of houses which were built was lower than the estimated number of 3, 000 and 3, 200 respectively. Furthermore, Scotland was the region where the lowest number of houses were constructed in 2002.
In conclusion, it is easy to observe that more houses were built in the UK in 2002 than had been anticipated.
The diagram depicts the actual and
estimated
numbers
of
houses
built in the UK by seven regions in 2002.
Overall
, it is
clear
that depending on particular regions, significant differences were
seen
between actual and
estimated
numbers
.
However
,
in most cases
, the
expected
number
was below the
number
of
houses
which
were built
.
To be more precise, the highest
numbers
of
houses
were constructed
in Southern England (77, 500), London (47, 800), and in Central England (16, 200), far exceeding the estimates of 51, 100, 24, 800 and 8, 100
respectively
.
Similarly
, in the North of England, there was a disparity
just
over 4, 000 between these figures, 9, 300
houses
for the
estimated
figure against 13, 500 for the actual one.
Besides
, Northern Ireland and Wales followed the same trend, 2, 500
houses
as compared to 5, 500, and 2, 900 opposed to 6, 300.
Strikingly
,
only
in Scotland that the
number
of
houses
which
were built
was lower than the
estimated
number
of 3, 000 and 3, 200
respectively
.
Furthermore
, Scotland was the region where the lowest
number
of
houses
were constructed
in 2002.
In conclusion
, it is easy to observe that more
houses
were built
in the UK in 2002 than had
been anticipated
.
7Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
20Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
0Mistakes