Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The table below gives information about the percentage of land covered by forest in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with estimated figures for 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where releva v.2

The table below gives information about the percentage of land covered by forest in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with estimated figures for 2015
The table sheds the light on the proportion of forest covered land in different countries between the years 1990 and 2005 and gives a projection towards 2015. Overall, Brazil had the highest percentage in all years, while Chile and Australia had the lowest. Unfortunately, Australia and Brazil showed a decrease in their percentages over time. However, New Zealand and Chile improved the areas filled by forest. First of all, Although Brazil had a falling in the numbers of lands covered by forest over the years; from 62. 2% in 1990 to 57. 2% in 2005 and to an estimated percentage of 53. 5% in 2015, it did manage to stay in the first place among the other three countries. On the other hand, in 1990, Chile had the smallest area of only 20. 4%. However, in 2005 Chile managed to improve its percentage by 0. 9%, which made Australia become the lowest in percentage in that year with only 21. 3%. Fortunately, New Zealand showed the biggest improvement over the years, from 28. 8% to 31. 0% with a projection to reach 32. 3% in 2015, that kept it in the second place among those four countries over a period of a decade and a half.
The table sheds the light on the proportion of forest covered land in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
countries between the years 1990 and 2005 and gives a projection towards 2015.

Overall
, Brazil had the highest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
in all years, while Chile and Australia had the lowest. Unfortunately, Australia and Brazil
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
showed
a decrease in their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentages
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
over
time.
However
, New Zealand and Chile
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improved
the areas filled by forest.

This phrase is redundant. Consider using "first".
First of all
, Although Brazil had a falling in the numbers of lands covered by forest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
over
the years; from 62. 2% in 1990 to 57. 2% in 2005 and to an estimated
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of 53. 5% in 2015, it did manage to stay in the
first
place among the other three countries.
On the other hand
, in 1990, Chile had the smallest area of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
20. 4%.
However
, in 2005 Chile managed to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improve
its
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
by 0. 9%, which made Australia become the lowest in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
in that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
year
with
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
21. 3%.

Fortunately
, New Zealand
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
showed
the biggest improvement
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
over
the years, from 28. 8% to 31. 0% with a projection to reach 32. 3% in 2015, that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
kept
it in the second place among those four countries
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
over
a period of a decade and a half.
6Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
10Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes

IELTS academic The table below gives information about the percentage of land covered by forest in various countries in 1990 and 2005 with estimated figures for 2015

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
206 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts