Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The table below compares Canadian government investments in various alternative energies in three different years.

The table below compares Canadian government investments in various alternative energies in three different years. pOgd
The given tabular chart illustrate the information about the Canadian government investments in coal, natural gas, nuclear, wind, solar and other energies between 2005 and 2015. Overview, it is clearly seen that the highest amount of energy spended by Canadian authority on coal and least amount of energy invest in solar energy. Looking at the detail, in 2005 the Canadian government invest energy from coal was 44. 93%. After a decade, it was sharp decreased with the percentage of 10. In contrast, the proportion of investment in natural gas was 35% in 2005 and there was a dramatic decline in the proportion of natural gas was 25% in 2015 and followed by nuclear energy that was 23% in same year before showing decreasing trend with the percentage of 4. 59 % in 2010. In the case of wind energy, there was minor differences with slight increase observed over the time period having the ratio of 7%. Furthermore, Canadian authority spended in solar energy and other energy in 2005 with 0. 02% and 8. 16% respectively and followed by 2015 where investment grew up with the proportion of 1% in both energies.
The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
tabular chart illustrate the information about the Canadian
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
investments in coal, natural gas, nuclear, wind, solar and other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energies
between 2005 and 2015. Overview, it is
clearly
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that the highest amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
Possible spelling mistake. Did you mean "spent", the past tense form of the verb 'spend'?
spended
by Canadian authority on coal and least amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
invest in solar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
. Looking at the detail, in 2005 the Canadian
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
government
invest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
from coal was 44. 93%. After a decade, it was sharp decreased with the percentage of 10.
In contrast
, the proportion of investment in natural gas was 35% in 2005 and there was a dramatic decline in the proportion of natural gas was 25% in 2015 and followed by nuclear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
that was 23% in same year
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
showing decreasing trend with the percentage of 4. 59 % in 2010.

In the case of wind
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
,
Did you mean "there were minor differences"?
there was minor differences
with slight increase observed over the time period having the ratio of 7%.
Furthermore
, Canadian authority
Possible spelling mistake. Did you mean "spent", the past tense form of the verb 'spend'?
spended
in solar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
and other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
in 2005 with 0. 02% and 8. 16%
respectively
and followed by 2015 where investment grew up with the proportion of 1% in both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energies
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The table below compares Canadian government investments in various alternative energies in three different years.

Academic
  American English
2 paragraphs
191 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts