Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The provided data illustrates the outcomes of the surveys about a university on various parameters reported by the students from 2000 to 2010.

The provided data illustrates the outcomes of the surveys about a university on various parameters reported by the students from 2000 to 2010. r8LVl
The provided data illustrates the outcomes of the surveys about a university on various parameters reported by the students from 2000 to 2010. Overall, the teaching facilities maintained the average rating throughout the decade whereas the electronic resources were improved a lot as the ratings got almost doubled in the decade. As per the table, the students rated the print resources the highest in the decade as 87% like the facility in 2000, and in the year 2010, the ratings were settled at 88%. Similarly, the teaching and building aspect in the university maintained the second-highest rating of 77% over the decade. Moreover, the technical quality of the university dipped by 2% in the year 2005 compared to the previous ratings, however, it got improved by 6% in the year 2010. Furthermore, the electronic resources in the university were second-lowest in the year 2000, though the ratings quickly rose to 72% in 2005 and further increased to 88% at the decade end. The range of modules offered by the university was lowest rated in the year 2000 and the ratings were declining slightly and settled at 27% in the year 2010.
The provided data illustrates the outcomes of the surveys about a
university
on various parameters reported by the students from 2000 to 2010.

Overall
, the teaching facilities maintained the average
rating
throughout the decade whereas the electronic resources were
improved
a lot as the
ratings
got
almost doubled in the decade.

As per the table, the students rated the print resources the highest in the decade as 87% like the facility in 2000, and in the
year
2010, the
ratings
were settled
at 88%.
Similarly
, the teaching and building aspect in the
university
maintained the second-highest
rating
of 77% over the decade.
Moreover
, the technical quality of the
university
dipped by 2% in the
year
2005 compared to the previous
ratings
,
however
, it
got
improved
by 6% in the
year
2010.

Furthermore
, the electronic resources in the
university
were second-lowest in the
year
2000, though the
ratings
quickly
rose to 72% in 2005 and
further
increased to 88% at the decade
end
. The range of modules offered by the
university
was
lowest
rated in the
year
2000 and the
ratings
were declining
slightly
and settled at 27% in the
year
2010.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The provided data illustrates the outcomes of the surveys about a university on various parameters reported by the students from 2000 to 2010.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
191 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: