The pie charts manifest the dangerous waste treatment scenario worldwide, grouped by three different countries.
From an overall perspective, the burying method remained the most popular among the three nations. Notably, United Kingdom accommodated more ways to resolve waste than the others.
As observed, burying trash in the United Kingdom occupied more than three-fourth of the waste treating methods, at 82%. Chemical treatment and dumping at sea method accounted for nearly one-fifth of the chart, and both equally stood at 8%. In contrast, burning waste only held 2% of the waste treatment proportion in the UK. In contrast, most of the garbage in Sweden was disposed of using underground treating methods, which constituted 55%. Incineration in Sweden was ten times higher than in the UK at 20%, and there was a modern recycling treatment, accounted for a quarter.
Likewise, 69% of waste in the Republic of Korea was processed primarily by recycling, nearly three-fourths. The underground treatment made up 22%, marking a more considerable proportion than the incineration process.
The pie charts manifest the
dangerous
waste
treatment
scenario worldwide, grouped by three
different
countries.
From an
overall
perspective, the burying
method
remained the most popular among the three nations.
Notably
, United Kingdom accommodated more ways to resolve
waste
than the others.
As observed, burying trash in the United Kingdom occupied more than three-fourth of the
waste
treating
methods
, at 82%. Chemical
treatment
and dumping at sea
method
accounted for
nearly
one-fifth of the chart, and both
equally
stood at 8%.
In contrast
, burning
waste
only
held 2% of the
waste
treatment
proportion in the UK.
In contrast
, most of the garbage in Sweden
was disposed
of using underground treating
methods
, which constituted 55%. Incineration in Sweden was ten times higher than in the UK at 20%, and there was a modern recycling
treatment
, accounted for a quarter.
Likewise
, 69% of
waste
in the Republic of Korea
was processed
primarily
by recycling,
nearly
three-fourths. The underground
treatment
made up 22%, marking a more considerable proportion than the incineration process.