The both pie charts depict that how much proportion of household investment by Japan and Malaysia in 2010. Analysing the garph deeply, it is vivid that in the year of 2010, the highest cost was spent on items and services in Japan that was 29%, while" the percentage of housing and transportation invested 24 percent by Japan but it was 3% higher in Malaysia. In addition, Japan was spending only 6 percent on health care.
Moving forward, Malaysia expenditures on transport that was ten percent, but it was raised by housing. Moreover, the consumption of food, other goods and services, it was respectively 26% and 27%, whereas, healthcare investment was low compared by japan. It was merely three percentages.
Overall, it is clearly seen that maximum cost spent on housing, goods and services by the both nations but lowest investment was about health care.
The both pie charts depict that how much proportion of household investment by
Japan
and Malaysia in 2010.
Analysing
the
garph
deeply
, it is vivid that in the year of 2010, the highest cost
was spent
on items and services in
Japan
that was 29%, while
"
the percentage of housing and transportation invested 24 percent by
Japan
but
it was 3% higher in Malaysia.
In addition
,
Japan
was spending
only
6 percent on health care.
Moving forward, Malaysia expenditures on transport that was ten percent,
but
it
was raised
by housing.
Moreover
, the consumption of food, other
goods
and services, it was
respectively
26% and 27%, whereas, healthcare investment was low compared by
japan
. It was
merely
three percentages.
Overall
, it is
clearly
seen
that maximum cost spent on housing,
goods
and services by the both nations
but
lowest investment was about health care.