The given line graph represents examination results of England and UK, between 2001 and 2006.
Evidently, from the given line graph there was steady increase in terms of percentage reported in England and UK. However, in England this improvement stagnated at a number of point prior to picking up for the better part of the years.
In London the line graph demonstrated a steady increase in terms of performance with slightly above 45% in 2001. Despite recording a lower rate than England in 2003, London was at par in terms of examination performance having the same rate as England. In 2006 London recorded a higher percentage than England which was around 58%.
In England, by the looks of things the trend was a little different. There was an improvement from 2001 at 48% to 51% in 2003, at this point there was no beneficial change until after 2004. In between 2004 and 2006 there was a drastic improvement with around 57% reported at the end.
The
given
line graph represents examination results of England and UK, between 2001 and 2006.
Evidently
, from the
given
line graph there was steady increase in terms of percentage reported in England and UK.
However
, in England this improvement stagnated at a number of point prior to picking up for the better part of the years.
In London the line graph demonstrated a steady increase in terms of performance with
slightly
above 45% in 2001. Despite recording a lower rate than England in 2003, London was at par in terms of examination performance having the same rate as England. In 2006 London recorded a higher percentage than England which was around 58%.
In England, by the looks of things the trend was a
little
different
. There was an improvement from 2001 at 48% to 51% in 2003, at this point there was no beneficial
change
until after 2004. In between 2004 and 2006 there was a drastic improvement with around 57% reported at the
end
.