Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The line graph compares the proportion of staff trained coaching by four different companies over a period of 3 years.

The line graph compares the proportion of staff trained coaching by four different companies over a period of 3 years. B77aV
The line graph compares the proportion of staff trained coaching by four different companies over a period of 3 years. It is clear that company C was by far the highest staff trained over the period shown. Company A provided the lowest proportion of staff trained. In 2003, company B were the main staff trained, training around 28% of workforce. Company A and C trained just under 27% of staff each, and company D trained a negligible percentage. Just one year later, nuclear power overtook thermal power as primary source of electricity. Between 2004 and 2005, staff trained from Company D rose dramatically to 32%. By contrast, the figure for Company A fell to only 25% in 2005, and remained at this level for the rest of the period. Company B remained relatively stable, at between 28 and 34 %, for the whole 3-year period, but Company C saw only a small rise to approximately 25 watt hours by 2012.
The line graph compares the proportion of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
staff
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trained
coaching by four
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
companies
over a
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
of 3 years.

It is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
C was by far the highest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
staff
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trained
over the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
shown.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
A provided the lowest proportion of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
staff
trained.

In 2003,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
B were the main
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
staff
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trained
, training around 28% of workforce.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
A and C
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trained
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
under 27% of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
staff
each, and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
company
D
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trained
a negligible percentage.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Just
one year later, nuclear power overtook thermal power as primary source of electricity.

Between 2004 and 2005,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
staff
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trained
from
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
D rose
dramatically
to 32%. By contrast, the figure for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
A fell to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
25% in 2005, and remained at this level for the rest of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
B remained
relatively
stable, at between 28 and 34 %, for the whole 3-year
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
period
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Company
C
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
saw
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
rise to approximately 25 watt hours by 2012.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The line graph compares the proportion of staff trained coaching by four different companies over a period of 3 years.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
160 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts