Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

the graph shown below shows the average carbon emissions of the United kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal.

the graph shown below shows the average carbon emissions of the United kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal. mLGDd
The provided line-graph depicted the change in average carbon emissions of 4 countries over a period of 40 years, from 1967 to 2007. The trend of average carbon dioxide emission per person is variable for every country. Some countries like the United Kingdom and Sweden had reduced their carbon footprint considerably whereas others like Italy and Portugal had done the exact opposite. In 1967, the United Kingdom lead the tally with around 11 metric tonnes of carbon dioxide emissions. Sweden was second, with a share of around 8. 5-9 metric tonnes. An average Italian person only emitted 4. 1 metric tonnes whereas Portugese had the least carbon footprint with 1. 9 metric tonnes. In 2007, however, the carbon dioxide emission by an average Britisher soared to 8. 5 metric tonnes. The graph for an average UK citizen shows a gradual down slope over the past 40 years. For Sweden on the other hand, a sharp upstroke was noticed from 1967 to 1977 of around 2 metric tonnes, which steeply reduced by 3 metric tonnes to around 6. 5 metric tonnes in 1987. In 20 years, from 1987 to 2007 however, there was a gradual fall in numbers and in 2007, only 6 metric tonnes on an average were contributed. Italy and Portugal both had a steep increase in their emissions from 1967 to 1997. Portugal had a steeper slope than Italy beginning from 1. 8 and inclining till 5. 8 metric tonnes. The rate however, plateaued from 1997 to 2007. Italy also had 4 metric tonnes share per person which progressed to 8 metric tonnes over a period of 30 years and stabilised from 1997 to 2007. Overall, the emission by an average United Kingdom resident still surpasses other countries. However, it can be safely presumed that with declining numbers Britishers might not remain at the top. Sweden is one such example of significant change. However, Italy and Portugal need to implement stringent measures to reduce or stabilize their overall output.
The provided line-graph depicted the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
average
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carbon
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
of 4
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
over a period of 40 years, from 1967 to 2007. The trend of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
average
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carbon
dioxide
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emission
per person is variable for every
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
Some
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
like the United Kingdom and Sweden had
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduced
their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carbon
footprint
considerably
whereas others like Italy and Portugal had done the exact opposite.

In 1967, the United Kingdom lead the tally with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
around
11 metric tonnes of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carbon
dioxide
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
. Sweden was second, with a share of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
around
8. 5-9 metric tonnes. An
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
average
Italian person
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
emitted 4. 1 metric tonnes whereas
Possible spelling mistake found.
Portugese
had the least
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carbon
footprint with 1. 9 metric tonnes.

In 2007,
however
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
carbon
dioxide
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emission
by an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
average
Britisher soared to 8. 5 metric tonnes. The graph for an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
average
UK citizen
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
a gradual down slope over the past 40 years. For Sweden
on the other hand
, a sharp upstroke
was noticed
from 1967 to 1977 of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
around
2 metric tonnes, which
steeply
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduced
by 3 metric tonnes to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
around
6. 5 metric tonnes in 1987. In 20 years, from 1987 to 2007
however
, there was a gradual fall in numbers and in 2007,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
6 metric tonnes on an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
average
were contributed
. Italy and Portugal both had a steep increase in their
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emissions
from 1967 to 1997. Portugal had a steeper slope than Italy beginning from 1. 8 and inclining till 5. 8 metric tonnes. The rate
however
, plateaued from 1997 to 2007. Italy
also
had 4 metric tonnes share per person which progressed to 8 metric tonnes over a period of 30 years and
Possible spelling mistake. 'stabilised' is British English.
stabilised
from 1997 to 2007.

Overall
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
emission
by an
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
average
United Kingdom resident
still
surpasses other
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
.
However
, it can be
safely
presumed that with declining numbers Britishers might not remain at the top. Sweden is one such example of significant
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
change
.
However
, Italy and Portugal need to implement stringent measures to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduce
or
Do not mix variants of the same word ('stabilize' and 'stabilise') within a single text.
stabilize
their
overall
output.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic the graph shown below shows the average carbon emissions of the United kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
331 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts