Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008.

The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008. Q1QK
The bar chart illustrates three different method of waste disposal (landfill, burning and dumping in sea) in European country over the 4 years period of time. Unit is given in million tonnes. From the cursory glance, it can be observed that the most used method for waste disposal was landfill in year 2005 and 2006. To begin with, in 2005, 2000 million tonnes waste was dispose by the landfill while 1600 million tonnes in 2006 used same category for garbage disposal. In contrast to this, by landfill method in 2008, 1200 million tonnes waste disposed. 900 million tonnes waste was throw away by burn method in 2005 whereas in 2006, just under 1200 million tonnes waste discard by burning method. On he other hand, by using similar method nearly 900 million tonnes garbage throw out in 2008. Furthermore, almost 1200 million tonnes waste in 2005 discard by dumping in sea method likewise by using same method just above 1400 million tonnes garbage was throw away in 2006. But in 2008, same method was used for waste disposal, in which amount of waste throw away was consider as over 1600 million tonnes. overall, it can be seen from the graph that from 2005 to 2008 landfill method of waste disposal had downward trend while dumped in sea method denoted upward trend.
The bar chart illustrates three
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
disposal
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
(landfill
, burning and dumping in sea) in European country over the 4 years period of time. Unit is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
in
Use "a million" or use a number before 'million'.
million
tonnes. From the cursory glance, it can
be observed
that the most
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
disposal
was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
landfill
in year 2005 and 2006. To
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
begin
with, in 2005, 2000
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
was dispose by the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
landfill
while 1600
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes in 2006
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
same category for garbage
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
disposal
.
In contrast
to this, by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
landfill
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
in 2008, 1200
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
disposed. 900
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
throw
away by burn
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
in 2005 whereas in 2006,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
under 1200
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
discard by burning
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
. On
Did you mean "the"?
he
other hand, by using similar
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
nearly
900
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes garbage
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
throw
out in 2008.

Furthermore
, almost 1200
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
in 2005 discard by dumping in sea
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
likewise
by using same
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
above 1400
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes garbage was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
throw
away in 2006.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
in 2008, same
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
was
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
disposal
, in which amount of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
throw
away was
Consider using a past participle here: "considered".
consider
as over 1600
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes.

This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
overall
, it can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
from the graph that from 2005 to 2008
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
landfill
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
disposal
had downward
Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: "trended".
trend
while dumped in sea
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
denoted upward trend.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The graph below shows the information on waste disposal in a European country from 2005 to 2008.

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
220 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts