Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a Europe country between 1979 and 2004. Summairse the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a Europe country between 1979 and 2004. Summairse the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 2Mkb
The graph below demonstrates the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country from 1979 to 2004. The gradual development and degradation of consuming fish and other meats in the mentioned timeline compared through data. Consumption of Chicken in 1979 was around 148 grams, while the eating of chicken gradually increased over the years and the rate reached to 252 grams in 2002. Whereas the country consumed more beef calculating an estimate of 225 grams, which gone down through the years to 170 grams in 1982. People of the country also consumed 150 grams of lambs, which decreased to 55grams in 2004. Consumption of fish in the country had maintained a steady ratio, which was 52 grams in 1979 came down to under 50grams on 2002. The overall consumption of Chicken increased in between the timeline, while the consuming of Beef had reduced at a high rate, consumption of lambs and fish also followed a downwards in the graph.
The graph below demonstrates the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
of fish and
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
kinds of meat in a European
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
from 1979 to 2004. The gradual development and degradation of consuming fish and other meats in the mentioned timeline compared through data.

Consumption of Chicken in 1979 was around 148
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
, while the eating of chicken
gradually
increased over the years and the rate reached to 252
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
in 2002. Whereas the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
consumed more beef calculating an estimate of 225
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
, which gone down through the years to 170
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
in 1982.
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
People
of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
also
consumed 150
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
of lambs, which decreased to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
55grams
in 2004.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Consumption
of fish in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
had maintained a steady ratio, which was 52
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
in 1979 came down to under
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
50grams
on 2002.

The
overall
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
of Chicken increased in between the timeline, while the consuming of Beef had
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduced
at a high rate,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
of lambs and fish
also
followed
Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean "a downward" or simply "downwards"?
a downwards
in the graph.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a Europe country between 1979 and 2004. Summairse the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
164 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a Europe country between 1979 and 2004. Summairse the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.