Generally, this graph describes the amount of garbage from three companies throughout fifteen years. It is obvious that entity C is only the one with increasing rate of waste; while the other two succeeded in severely decreasing their useless remainings. For further explanation and analysis, B and C met at 2010 were at the same level and B; moreover, C and A also met after a number of years. However, these indicators did not stop the principle of C to review their strategy again. Accordingly, this reflects that C is harming the environment more; and it is reccommended to induce a greater percent of taxes on them in order to make them efficiently, in a safer manner.
Through a detailed outlook, first comes firm B which reduced its trash in the best way by various methods; for example, using filters for chimmenys, not throwing in rivers, not getting rid of such harms by burning them. At 2005, B suffered the top of amount, that reached its minimum in 2015. Afterwards, institute A achieved its peak at 2000, declining at 2015 from 12 to 9 tonnes. At the end, thirdly comes A, where at the contract its trough was at the begining of the period and its maximum point was at the end of the period. To conclude, it is clear that A and B might be at a common point after a certain time; on the other hand, B should revise its techiques and strategies. Thus, if the latest did not change its track; surely, it might be out of the competing market.
Generally
, this graph
describes
the amount of garbage from three
companies
throughout fifteen years. It is obvious that entity C is
only
the one with increasing rate of waste; while the other two succeeded in
severely
decreasing their useless
remainings
. For
further
explanation and analysis, B and C met at 2010 were at the same level and B;
moreover
, C and A
also
met after a number of years.
However
, these indicators did not
stop
the principle of C to review their strategy again.
Accordingly
, this reflects that C is harming the environment more; and it is
reccommended
to induce a greater percent of taxes on them in order to
make
them
efficiently
, in a safer manner.
Through a detailed outlook,
first
comes
firm B which
reduced
its trash in the best way by various methods;
for example
, using filters for
chimmenys
, not throwing in rivers, not getting rid of such harms by burning them. At 2005, B suffered the top of amount, that reached its minimum in 2015. Afterwards, institute A achieved its peak at 2000, declining at 2015 from 12 to 9 tonnes. At the
end
,
thirdly
comes
A, where at the contract its trough was at the
begining
of the period and its maximum point was at the
end
of the period.
To conclude
, it is
clear
that A and B might be at a common point after a certain time;
on the other hand
, B should revise its
techiques
and strategies.
Thus
, if the latest did not
change
its
track
;
surely
, it might be out of the competing market.