Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The graph below shows the amount in grams of potatoes, pasta and rice eaten in a European country between 1976 and 2006. v.1

The graph below shows the amount in grams of potatoes, pasta and rice eaten in a European country between 1976 and 2006. v. 1
The line graph compares the intake of three food items – potato, pasta and rice in a European country between 1976 and 2006. The unit is given in grams and it represents the consumption by each person in a week. Overall, potato consumption was higher than rice and pasta consumption in the 1970s but after three decades, pasta became the most popular. Getting back to the details, around 400 grams of potato was consumed by each person in a week in 1976 in this country. At that time, the consumption of rice was exactly 300 grams, which was slightly higher than that of pasta. After ten years, pasta consumption skyrocketed while rice consumption plummeted and potato intake slightly dropped. In 1996, pasta became the highest consumed food at 500 grams while potato intake dropped to around 300 grams and rice below 20 grams. Finally, in 2006, pasta intake stood at 500 grams as it was 10 years earlier while potato eating per person further dipped and reached the nadir at only 100 grams. With a slight increase in potato consumption than 5 years earlier, potato remained as the second most preferred food in this country.
The line graph compares the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
intake
of three food items
Consider using an m-dash if you do not want to join two words.
–
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
potato
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pasta
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rice
in a European country between 1976 and 2006. The unit is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
and it represents the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
by each person in a week.
Overall
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
potato
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
was higher than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rice
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pasta
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
in the 1970s
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
after three decades,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pasta
became the most popular.

Getting back to the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
details
, around 400
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
potato
was consumed
by each person in a week in 1976 in this country. At that time, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rice
was exactly 300
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
, which was
slightly
higher than that of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pasta
. After ten years,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pasta
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
skyrocketed while
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rice
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
plummeted and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
potato
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
intake
slightly
dropped. In 1996,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pasta
became the highest consumed food at 500
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
while
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
potato
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
intake
dropped to around 300
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rice
below 20
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
.
Finally
, in 2006,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
pasta
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
intake
stood at 500
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
as it was 10 years earlier while
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
potato
eating per person
further
dipped and reached the nadir at
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
100
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
. With a slight increase in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
potato
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
than 5 years earlier,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
potato
remained as the second most preferred food in this country.
3Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
39Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
1Mistakes

IELTS academic The graph below shows the amount in grams of potatoes, pasta and rice eaten in a European country between 1976 and 2006. v. 1

Academic
  American English
2 paragraphs
195 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts