Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The given table gives information of six different types of families who were impoverished in Australia in 1999

The given table gives information of six different types of families who were impoverished in Australia in 1999 D2DYW
The given table gives information of six different types of families who were impoverished in Australia in 1999 Overall, it is clear that the percentage of sole parents as well as the rate of people who were single and without children living in poverty were the highest. In contrast, the ratio of aged person and aged couple covered a tiny part. In 1999, the number of single aged people who lived in poverty was the lowest, at 6% or 54000 people respectively. However, over one fifth of single parents lived in poverty and the proportion of single people without children who were impoverished was 19% The rate of poor couples who had children was 19%, which was roughly five times greater than the rate of impoverished aged couples. In addition, 7% or 211000 of couple who did not have children lived in poverty
The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
table gives information of six
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
types of families
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
were impoverished
in Australia in 1999

Overall
, it is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
that the percentage of sole parents
as well
as the rate of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
were
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
single
and without
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
living in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
were the highest.
In contrast
, the ratio of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
aged
person and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
aged
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couple
covered a tiny part.

In 1999, the number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
single
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
aged
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lived
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
was the lowest, at 6% or 54000
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
respectively
.
However
, over one fifth of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
single
parents
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lived
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
poverty
and the proportion of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
single
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
without
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
were impoverished
was 19%

The rate of poor
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couples
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
had
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
was 19%, which was roughly five times greater than the rate of impoverished
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
aged
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couples
.
In addition
, 7% or 211000 of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
couple
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
did not have
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
children
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
lived
in
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph
poverty
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The given table gives information of six different types of families who were impoverished in Australia in 1999

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
142 words
This writing has been penalized,
text can't be
less than 250 words in Task 2
and less than 150 words in Task 1
5.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The given table gives information of six different types of families who were impoverished in Australia in 1999