Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The given line graphs illustrate the percentage of people at the age of 15 with low knowledge levels in different countries Austria, Denmark, Ireland and Sweden from 2000 to 2009.

The given line graphs illustrate the percentage of people at the age of 15 with low knowledge levels in different countries Austria, Denmark, Ireland and Sweden from 2000 to 2009. 5BX7N
The given line graphs illustrate the percentage of people at the age of 15 with low knowledge levels in different countries Austria, Denmark, Ireland and Sweden from 2000 to 2009. Overall, It is obvious that there was an upward trend in the figure for 15 years old along with minor education in Austria, Ireland, Sweden respectively. However, the opposite was true for the data of people with low literacy in Denmark. In 2000, the data of people at the age 15 with low education in Austria stood at 15%, before increased gradually to approximately 21% in the next 3 following years. The year 2006 witnessed an increase slightly by 1%, which was followed by an increase significantly to approximately 26% in 2009. While the Denmark proportion of 15 years old with low knowledge stood at 18% then decreased slightly to 15% over the period. The percentage of people who were 15 years old with low education in Sweden stood at approximately 13% in 2000 before remained stable at 14% in 2003. Additionally, There was a slowly raised to exactly 15% in 2006 but later increased significantly to 17% in 2009. While, The data of people in their 15 years old with low thinking in Ireland stood at 11% in 2000 and then remained the same at 11% in the following 3 years, but then increased sharply to 12% in 2006, which was following by an increased rapidly to 17% as same as Sweden over the research period.
The
given
line graphs illustrate the percentage of
people
at the age of 15 with
low
knowledge levels in
different
countries Austria, Denmark, Ireland and Sweden from 2000 to 2009.

Overall
, It is obvious that there was an upward trend in the figure for 15 years
old
along with minor education in Austria, Ireland, Sweden
respectively
.
However
, the opposite was true for the data of
people
with
low
literacy in Denmark.

In 2000, the data of
people
at the age 15 with
low
education in Austria
stood
at 15%,
before
increased
gradually
to approximately 21% in the
next
3 following years. The
year
2006 witnessed an increase
slightly
by 1%, which
was followed
by an increase
significantly
to approximately 26% in 2009.
While
the Denmark proportion of 15 years
old
with
low
knowledge
stood
at 18% then decreased
slightly
to 15% over the period.

The percentage of
people
who were 15 years
old
with
low
education in Sweden
stood
at approximately 13% in 2000
before
remained stable at 14% in 2003.
Additionally
, There was a
slowly
raised to exactly 15% in 2006
but
later
increased
significantly
to 17% in 2009. While, The data of
people
in their 15 years
old
with
low
thinking in Ireland
stood
at 11% in 2000 and then remained the same at 11% in the following 3 years,
but
then
increased
sharply
to 12% in 2006, which was following by an
increased
rapidly
to 17% as same as Sweden over the research period.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The given line graphs illustrate the percentage of people at the age of 15 with low knowledge levels in different countries Austria, Denmark, Ireland and Sweden from 2000 to 2009.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
247 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts