The given graphs compare UK school’s expenditures on several features in three time line.
The given graphs compare UK school’s expenditures on several features in three time line. waxYY
The given graphs compare UK school’s expenditures on several features in three time line. Overall, teacher’s salaries were spent to the utmost, but the expense of insurance was trivial.
The greatest percentage of yearly school spending was consistently paid to teachers, as seen in the graphs. This feature illustrated an upward trend of 10% in the first decade, accounting for one-half of the entire graph. Finally, the proportion decreased 5% in 2001, followed by furniture and equipment with 23%. However, before attained such a substantial number, the aforementioned characteristic had exerted a considerable alteration in the hierarchy. Aside from that, payments for other worker’s wages and resources e. g books witnessed a downward trend over the span of 20 years. While the spending on worker’s income had the disparity of about 6% per decade, the latter state grew by 5% until falling to 9% in 2001
In contrast, the disbursement on insurance was at the lowest level whose percentage ranged of no more than 8% during the frame of time.
The
given
graphs compare UK school’s expenditures on several features in three time line.
Overall
, teacher’s salaries
were spent
to the utmost,
but
the expense of insurance was trivial.
The greatest percentage of yearly school spending was
consistently
paid to teachers, as
seen
in the graphs. This feature illustrated an upward trend of 10% in the
first
decade, accounting for one-half of the entire graph.
Finally
, the proportion decreased 5% in 2001, followed by furniture and equipment with 23%.
However
,
before
attained such a substantial number, the aforementioned characteristic had exerted a considerable alteration in the hierarchy. Aside from that, payments for other worker’s wages and resources e. g books witnessed a downward trend over the span of 20 years. While the spending on worker’s income had the disparity of about 6% per decade, the latter state grew by 5% until falling to 9% in 2001
In contrast
, the disbursement on insurance was at the lowest level whose percentage ranged of no more than 8% during the frame of time.