The line graph depicts the amount of different types of jam, sold in the period of 2009-2014.
It could be plainly viewed, that all kinds of jam experienced oscillations, followed by steady upward trend, excepting a plum, which in the beginning constituted about 2. 5 millions, exactly equal to the raspberry, but unlike it, plum lost almost 0. 5 millions each year and in 2014 hit a low of 0 millions sold. Reverse trend can be seen in the grape sales: starting with 0. 5 millions it each year grew in 0. 6-0. 8 millions, run up to 4. 5 millions in 2014.
At the same time, the highest position in the most of period was held by strawberry. In 2005 nearly 3. 1-3. 2 millions was consumed. It is worth noticing that while the sales of strawberry markedly rose, cherry and raspberry lost the buyers and vice versa. Such trend notable in 2011, when raspberry and cherry decreased to 3. 5 and 2 millions, strawberry reached 4. 5. And in 2014 strawberry peaked with 7 millions, while cherry lost 0. 2-0. 3.
The line graph depicts the amount of
different
types of jam, sold in the period of 2009-2014.
It could be
plainly
viewed, that all kinds of jam experienced oscillations, followed by steady upward trend, excepting a plum, which in the beginning constituted about 2. 5
millions
, exactly equal to the raspberry,
but
unlike it, plum lost almost 0. 5
millions
each year and in 2014 hit a low of 0
millions
sold. Reverse trend can be
seen
in the grape sales: starting with 0. 5
millions
it each year grew in 0. 6-0. 8
millions
, run up to 4. 5
millions
in 2014.
At the same time, the highest position in the
most of period
was held
by strawberry. In 2005
nearly
3. 1-3. 2
millions
was consumed
. It is worth noticing that while the sales of strawberry
markedly
rose, cherry and raspberry lost the buyers and vice versa. Such trend notable in 2011, when raspberry and cherry decreased to 3. 5 and 2
millions
, strawberry reached 4. 5. And in 2014 strawberry peaked with 7
millions
, while cherry lost 0. 2-0. 3.