Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kind of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004

The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kind of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 odmB

The line graph illustrates the consumption of non-vegitable meals such as fish, lamb, beef and chicken, who eaten by a European people from 1979 to 2004. Overall, it can be seen that, in 1979, the consumption of beef was higher as compare to fish and which was least amount ate by per person, however consumption of chicken was increased during the period and that was highest quantity consumed by each in 2004. In 1979, the chicken was third highest position which consumed 150 grams per capita per week afterward that soar to approximately 250 grams in the year of 2004. To contrast, the consumption of beef and lamb had 220 grams and 150 grams respectively in 1979. Both the meals trend was decline throughout the period while it reached to beef at nearly 100 grams as well as lamb at 70 grams weekly per head. Moreover, the consumption of fish was just over 50 grams per individual in 1979 and then consumption of fish was level off but slightly decreasing trend during the period and that reached to just under the 50 grams per capita per week since 2004.

The line graph illustrates the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
 of Possible spelling mistake found.
non-vegitable
 meals such as fish, lamb, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmeat
beef
 and chicken, who eaten by a European This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 from 1979 to 2004.

Overall
, it can be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
seen
 that, in 1979, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmeat
beef
 was higher Comparison requires "than", not 'then' nor 'as'.than
as
 compare to fish and which was A determiner is probably missing here: "the least".the least
least
 amount ate by per person, however
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
 of chicken was increased
 during the period and that was A determiner is probably missing here: "the highest".the highest
highest
 quantity consumed by each in 2004.

In 1979, the chicken was third highest position which consumed 150 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmatriarchancestorgrannygrandma
grams
 per capita per week afterward that soar to approximately 250 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmatriarchancestorgrannygrandma
grams
 in the year of 2004. To contrast, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmeat
beef
 and lamb had 220 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmatriarchancestorgrannygrandma
grams
 and 150 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmatriarchancestorgrannygrandma
grams
respectively
 in 1979. Both the meals trend was decline throughout the period while it reached to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmeat
beef
 at nearly
 100 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmatriarchancestorgrannygrandma
grams
Probable usage error. Use "and" after 'both'.and
as well as
 lamb at 70 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmatriarchancestorgrannygrandma
grams
 weekly per head.

Moreover
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
 of fish was This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 over 50 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmatriarchancestorgrannygrandma
grams
 per individual in 1979 and then You use this word too often, consider replacing it withexpenditureutilizationdrinking
consumption
 of fish was level off This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
slightly
 decreasing trend during the period and that reached to This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 under the 50 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withmatriarchancestorgrannygrandma
grams
 per capita per week since 2004. 