Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The chart illustrated the proportion of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050. Overall, the percentage of people from 25 to over 65 declined dramatically, while the rate of population from 0 to 14 went up steadily. In addition, the proportion of people over 65 was the highest throughout the period.

The chart illustrated the proportion of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050. Overall, the percentage of people from 25 to over 65 declined dramatically, while the rate of population from 0 to 14 went up steadily. In addition, the proportion of people over 65 was the highest throughout the period. NleVN
The chart illustrated the proportion of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050. Overall, the percentage of people from 25 to over 65 declined dramatically, while the rate of population from 0 to 14 went up steadily. In addition, the proportion of people over 65 was the highest throughout the period. In 1950, the percentage of population over 65 accounted for 60%. But it hit 70% after 40 years. And the rate is predicted to decrease by 2050. The next highest proportion was people from 38 to 45. The percentage of people was below 30% in 1950. It is increased rapidly by 1990, which accounted for approximately 50%. The rate slowly fell down to 40% by 2000. By 2050, the population from 38 to 45 is expected to remain unchanged. In contrast, the percentage of population from 0 to 37 accounted lowest rate. In 1950, the proportion of two age groups were about 21% and 5%, respectively. There were a downward trend for all two groups by 1990. And both two age groups reached 10% in 2000. While population from 25 to 37 is forecasted to declined, the rate in the age 0 to 14 is projected to consistently climb by 2050.
The chart illustrated the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proportion
of New Zealand
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
from 1950 to 2050.
Overall
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
from 25 to over 65 declined
dramatically
, while the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
from 0 to 14 went up
steadily
.
In addition
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proportion
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
over 65 was the highest throughout the period.

In 1950, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
over 65 accounted for 60%.
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
But
it hit 70% after 40 years. And the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
is predicted
to decrease by 2050. The
next
highest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proportion
was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
from 38 to 45. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
people
was below 30% in 1950. It
is increased
rapidly
by 1990, which accounted for approximately 50%. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
slowly
fell down to 40% by 2000. By 2050, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
from 38 to 45 is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
expected
to remain unchanged.

In contrast
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
from 0 to 37 accounted
A determiner is probably missing here: "the lowest".
lowest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
. In 1950, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
proportion
of two age groups were about 21% and 5%,
respectively
. There were a downward trend for all two groups by 1990. And both two age groups reached 10% in 2000. While
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
population
from 25 to 37
is forecasted
to declined, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
in the age 0 to 14
is projected
to
consistently
climb by 2050.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The chart illustrated the proportion of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050. Overall, the percentage of people from 25 to over 65 declined dramatically, while the rate of population from 0 to 14 went up steadily. In addition, the proportion of people over 65 was the highest throughout the period.

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
202 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The chart illustrated the proportion of New Zealand population from 1950 to 2050. Overall, the percentage of people from 25 to over 65 declined dramatically, while the rate of population from 0 to 14 went up steadily. In addition, the proportion of people over 65 was the highest throughout the period.