Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The chart demonstrates labour rates in three zones of the economy, in the UK over a decade-long time span, from 2000 to 2010.

The chart demonstrates labour rates in three zones of the economy, in the UK over a decade-long time span, from 2000 to 2010. GL38B

The chart demonstrates labour rates in three zones of the economy, in the UK over a decade-long time span, from 2000 to 2010. From an overall perspective, it is apparent that there were significant upward trends in the employment rates of the public sector and the self-employed, while that of the private sector witnessed a dramatic fall over a period. Looking at the details, in 2000, the employment rate of the private sector was 48%, which meant that more people worked in this sector than the other two. Subsequently, the rate fell gradually from 2000 to 2003, decreasing to forty percent. At this point, there was a steep reduction in the first half of the decade, slumping to almost thirty percent. In the last half of decade, the rate continued to go down rapidly, diving to twenty percent. The employment rate hit bottom at twenty percent in 2010. Having remained stable at approximately thirty-eight percent in the first 2 years, the percent of people in the public sector rose sharply between 2002 and 2004, soaring more than forty percent over a two-year period. Next, the rate grew quickly until it had a slight drop in 2006. There was a minimal rise in the percentage of people who worked in the public sector, to just over fifty percent in 2010, this figure being the peak level of employment rate during the whole period. As regards the self-employed sector, in the first half of the decade, the figure witnessed a mild fluctuation, hovering around 18% and 20%. In the remaining time of the period

The chart demonstrates Possible spelling mistake. 'labour' is British English.labor
labour
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestimatequotapercentageamountstandard
rates
 in three zones of the economy, in the UK You use this word too often, consider replacing it withup
over
 a decade-long time span, from 2000 to 2010.

From an overall
 perspective, it is apparent that there were significant upward trends in the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbusinessserviceenrollmenttradejobhiring
employment
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestimatequotapercentageamountstandard
rates
 of the public You use this word too often, consider replacing it withregionpartdistrictzone
sector
 and the self-employed, while that of the private You use this word too often, consider replacing it withregionpartdistrictzone
sector
 witnessed a dramatic fall You use this word too often, consider replacing it withup
over
 a period.

Looking at the This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :particulars
details
, in 2000, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbusinessserviceenrollmenttradejobhiring
employment
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestimatequotapercentageamountstandard
rate
 of the private You use this word too often, consider replacing it withregionpartdistrictzone
sector
 was 48%, which meant that more This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 worked in this You use this word too often, consider replacing it withregionpartdistrictzone
sector
 than the other two. Subsequently
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestimatequotapercentageamountstandard
rate
 fell gradually
 from 2000 to 2003, decreasing to forty You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percent
. At this point, there was a steep reduction in the first
 half of the decade, slumping to almost thirty You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percent
. In the last half of decade, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestimatequotapercentageamountstandard
rate
 continued to go down rapidly
, diving to twenty You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percent
. The You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbusinessserviceenrollmenttradejobhiring
employment
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestimatequotapercentageamountstandard
rate
 hit bottom at twenty You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percent
 in 2010.

Having remained stable at approximately thirty-eight You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percent
 in the first
 2 years, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percent
 of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 in the public You use this word too often, consider replacing it withregionpartdistrictzone
sector
 rose sharply
 between 2002 and 2004, soaring more than forty You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percent
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withup
over
 a two-year period. Next
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestimatequotapercentageamountstandard
rate
 grew quickly
 until it had a slight drop in 2006. There was a minimal rise in the percentage of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 who worked in the public You use this word too often, consider replacing it withregionpartdistrictzone
sector
, to This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withup
over
 fifty You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percent
 in 2010, this figure being the peak level of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withbusinessserviceenrollmenttradejobhiring
employment
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withestimatequotapercentageamountstandard
rate
 during the whole period.

As regards the self-employed You use this word too often, consider replacing it withregionpartdistrictzone
sector
, in the first
 half of the decade, the figure witnessed a mild fluctuation, hovering around 18% and 20%. In the remaining time of the Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraphperiod.period!period?period:period,period;
period