Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010

The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 Xxlq

The chart illustrates the amount of money spent on five consumers goods (cars, computers, books, perfume and cameras ) in France and the UK in 2010. Units are measured in pounds sterling. Overall, the UK spent more money on consumers goods than France in the period given. Both the British and the French spent most of their money on cars whereas the least amount of money was spent on perfume in the UK compared to cameras in France. Furthermore, the most significant difference in expenditure between the two countries was on cameras. In terms of cars people in the UK spent about £450, 000 on this as opposed to the French at £400, 000. Similarly, the British expenditure was higher on books than the French (around £400, 000 and £300, 000 respectively ). In the UK, expenditure on cameras (just over £350, 000) was over double than of France, which was only £150, 000. On the other hand, the amount of money paid out on the remaining goods was higher in France. Above £350, 000 was spent by the French on computers which was slightly more than the British who spent exactly £350, 000. Neither of the countries spent much on perfume which accounted for £200, 000 of expenditure in France but under £150, 000 in the UK.

The chart illustrates the amount of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 on five consumers This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :productscommoditiesmerchandises
goods
 (cars, computers, books, perfume and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcamcorder
cameras
Don't put a space before the closing parenthesis)
 )
 in France and the UK in 2010. Units are measured
 in pounds sterling. Overall
, the UK You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
 on consumers This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :productscommoditiesmerchandises
goods
 than France in the period This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
. Both the British and the French You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 most of their You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
 on cars whereas the least amount of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
 was You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 on perfume in the UK compared to You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcamcorder
cameras
 in France. Furthermore
, the most significant difference in You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditure
 between the two countries was on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcamcorder
cameras
. In terms of cars This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 in the UK You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 about £450, 000 on this as opposed to the French at £400, 000. Similarly
, the British You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditure
 was higher on books than the French (around £400, 000 and £300, 000 respectively
Don't put a space before the closing parenthesis)
 )
. In the UK, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditure
 on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcamcorder
cameras
 (This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:merely
just
 over £350, 000) was over Use "doubler" to make a comparison with this adjective.doubler
double
 than of France, which was This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 £150, 000. On the other hand
, the amount of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withsalarywagewealthpaybillcash
money
 paid out on the remaining This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :productscommoditiesmerchandises
goods
 was higher in France. Above £350, 000 was You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 by the French on computers which was slightly
 more than the British who You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 exactly £350, 000. Neither of the countries You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 much on perfume which accounted for £200, 000 of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditure
 in France This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 under £150, 000 in the UK. 