Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010

The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 G2qL
The given chart provides information about the expenditure of the UK and France on consumer commodities over the year 2010. In the same way, the rate of consumables are measured in pounds sterling. Overall, the level of almost at all consumer goods in the UK were higher than in France. It can be seen that the level of expenditure of cars in both countries is greater than others and made up 400, 000 pounds in France and 450, 000 in the UK respectively. In contrast, the rate of consumables of computers in the UK was noticeably less and was equal to 350, 000 pounds whereas the level of expenditure in France was slightly more and amounted almost to 380, 000 pounds. Then, it is seen that the level of books in the UK exceeded the level in France and made up more than 400, 000 pounds. The levels of expenditure between perfume and camera in France were dramatically different. The level of perfume approximately amounted to 140, 000 pounds, whereas the level of camera exceeded the cost rate and made up 350, 000 pounds. Moreover, the rate of the last two consumables in the UK is less than in France.
The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
chart provides information about the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
expenditure
of the UK and France on consumer commodities over the year 2010.
In the same way
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
of consumables
are measured
in pounds sterling.

Overall
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
level
of almost at all consumer
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
goods
in the UK were higher than in France.

It can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
level
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
expenditure
of cars in both countries is greater than others and made up 400, 000 pounds in France and 450, 000 in the UK
respectively
.

In contrast
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
of consumables of computers in the UK was
noticeably
less and was equal to 350, 000 pounds whereas the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
level
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
expenditure
in France was
slightly
more and amounted almost to 380, 000 pounds.

Then, it is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
level
of books in the UK exceeded the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
level
in France and made up more than 400, 000 pounds. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
levels
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
expenditure
between perfume and camera in France were
dramatically
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
.

The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
level
of perfume approximately amounted to 140, 000 pounds, whereas the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
level
of camera exceeded the cost
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
and made up 350, 000 pounds.
Moreover
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rate
of the last two consumables in the UK is less than in France.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010

Academic
  American English
6 paragraphs
200 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010