Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002. d1xP
The chart shows the numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) that occured in 2002, comparing different types of transportation. By giving a quick look at the chart, it is possible to notice that incidents are always higher in number than injuries, regardless the mode of transportation, although in some categories the difference more marked than in others. For instance, commuter rail presents almost no difference between the two. It also appears very obvious how the section related to Demand Response transportation is the one where the highest numbers of injuries and incidents occur, with the latter reaching 250 per 100 million PMT. Fortunately, these rates are visibly lower in the other categories. Light Rail and Bus present slight differences: while they are both chacterised by approximately 75 incidents per 100 million PMT, the second one show a highest rate of injuries. With Heavy Rail and Commuter rail, which present the lowest numbers, incidents and injuries continue to decrease. In conclusion, we can say that Demand Response could be considered the most dangerous method of transportation given the numbers of incidents and injuries. However, we can also observe that since the marked difference between the two not all the incidents result in injuries for the people involved. This unfortunately doesn't apply to the case of Commuter rail. The numbers are indeed much lower, but as stated before there's almost no difference between incidents and injuries. This means that people who get involved in accidents get hurt the majority, if not totality, of the time.
The chart
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
shows
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
numbers
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
incidents
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
injuries
per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) that
Possible spelling mistake. Did you mean "occurred", the past tense form of the verb 'occur'?
occured
in 2002, comparing
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
types of transportation.

By giving a quick look at the chart, it is possible to notice that
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
incidents
are always higher in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
number
than
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
injuries
, regardless the mode of transportation, although in
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
some
categories the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
difference
more marked than in others.
For instance
, commuter
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rail
presents almost no
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
difference
between the two.

It
also
appears
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
obvious how the section related to Demand Response transportation is the one where the highest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
numbers
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
injuries
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
incidents
occur, with the latter reaching 250 per 100 million PMT.

Fortunately
, these rates are
visibly
lower in the other categories. Light
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Rail
and Bus present slight
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
differences
: while they are both
Possible spelling mistake found.
chacterised
by approximately 75
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
incidents
per 100 million PMT, the second one
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
show
Use "the" with the superlative.
a
highest rate of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
injuries
. With Heavy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Rail
and Commuter
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rail
, which present the lowest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
numbers
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
incidents
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
injuries
continue to decrease.

In conclusion
, we can say that Demand Response could
be considered
the most
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
dangerous
method of transportation
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
numbers
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
incidents
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
injuries
.
However
, we can
also
observe that since the marked
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
difference
between the two not all the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
incidents
result in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
injuries
for the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
involved. This unfortunately doesn't apply to the case of Commuter
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rail
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
numbers
are
indeed
much lower,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
as stated
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
there's almost no
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
difference
between
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
incidents
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
injuries
. This means that
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
people
who
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
involved in accidents
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
get
hurt the majority, if not totality, of the time.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002.

Academic
  American English
5 paragraphs
259 words
5.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 5.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The chart below shows numbers of incidents and injuries per 100 million passenger miles travelled (PMT) by transportation type in 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.