Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 v.1

The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 v. 1
The pie charts compare energy production from various sources in France in two years 1995 and 2005. It is clear that the percentage of energy produced from Coal was by far highest in both years. Additionally, while energy production from coal, gas, nuclear and other types of energy all increased in 2005, there was a slight decrease in the figure for Petro. In 1995, the proportion of energy production from Coal was highest, at precisely 29. 80%, while the figure for Gas was slightly lower, at 29. 63%. About 29. 27% of total energy was Petro compared to approximately 6. 4% from nuclear, whereas other sources made up a very small percentage of the total production, at 4. 9%. In 2005, the rate of energy created from Coal increase to 30. 93% and became the highest in the chart. Meanwhile, the figure for Gas rose gradually to 30. 31%. Petro' s energy production was a dramatic decrease of nearly 9. 72% to 19. 55%. There were sharp increases in the figures for Nuclear and other sources went up to 10. 10% and 9. 10% respectively.
The pie charts compare
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
from various sources in France in two years 1995 and 2005.

It is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
that the percentage of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
produced from Coal was by far highest in both years.
Additionally
, while
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
from coal, gas, nuclear and other types of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
all increased in 2005, there was a slight decrease in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
figure
for
Possible spelling mistake found.
Petro
.

In 1995, the proportion of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
from Coal was highest, at
precisely
29. 80%, while the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
figure
for Gas was
slightly
lower, at 29. 63%. About 29. 27% of total
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
was
Possible spelling mistake found.
Petro
compared to approximately 6. 4% from nuclear, whereas other sources made up a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
very
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
percentage of the total
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
, at 4. 9%.

In 2005, the rate of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
created from Coal increase to 30. 93% and became the highest in the chart. Meanwhile, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
figure
for Gas rose
gradually
to 30. 31%.
Possible spelling mistake found.
Petro&
#039; s
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
energy
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
production
was a dramatic decrease of
nearly
9. 72% to 19. 55%. There were sharp increases in the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
figures
for Nuclear and other sources went up to 10. 10% and 9. 10%
respectively
.
1Linking words, meeting the goal of 7 or more
17Repeated words, meeting the goal of 3 or fewer
3Mistakes

IELTS academic The chart below shows a comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in 1995 and 2005 v. 1

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
185 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 6.5
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Similar posts


Recent posts