Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

The bar graph below show the consumer goods in two countries

The bar graph below show the consumer goods in two countries qwnw

The given bar graph illustrates information about the expense outlay on five distinct consumer goods of two nations in 2010. The data is calibrated in pounds. Overall, it is noticeable that the maximum incur expenditure on cars, computers and books of France as against Perfume and Cameras. At a fleeting glance, it is immensely clear that in 2010, the expenditure on cars and computers were witnessed to be 400, 000 pounds and below 400, 000 pounds of France, respectively. Meanwhile, Expenditure on cars of the UK during stood at 450, 000 pounds as compared to 350, 000 in case of computers. As far as the expense outlay of London on books grabbed the lion's share with 400, 000 pound and this section was followed by cameras (350, 000). Moving further, As far as books are concerned, the expenditure was 300, 000 pound in year 2010, however it was two times more in the case of cameras. The carried out expenditure on perfume of France and the UK are concerned, it hovered between 100, 000 and 200, 000 pounds in year 2010.

The This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :accorded
given
 bar graph illustrates information about the expense outlay on five distinct consumer This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :productscommoditiesmerchandises
goods
 of two nations in 2010. The data is calibrated
 in pounds. Overall
, it is noticeable that the maximum incur You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditure
 on cars, computers and books of France as against Perfume and Cameras. At a fleeting glance, it is immensely
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 that in 2010, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditure
 on cars and computers were witnessed
 to be 400, 000 pounds and below 400, 000 pounds of France, respectively
. Meanwhile, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
Expenditure
 on cars of the UK during stood at 450, 000 pounds as compared to 350, 000 in case of computers. As far as the expense outlay of London on books grabbed the lion's share with 400, 000 Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: "pounds".pounds
pound
 and this section was followed
 by cameras (350, 000). Moving further
, As far as books are concerned
, the You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditure
 was 300, 000 Possible agreement error. The noun 'pound' seems to be countable, so consider using: "pounds".pounds
pound
 in year 2010, however
 it was two times more in the case of cameras. The carried out You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditure
 on perfume of France and the UK are concerned
, it hovered between 100, 000 and 200, 000 pounds in year 2010. 