Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The diagram below shows the percentage of good quality water in four countries from 1995 to 2010. It also shows the prediction for 2018. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The diagram below shows the percentage of good quality water in four countries from 1995 to 2010. It also shows the prediction for 2018. mw0d
The given line graph depicts that the number of rivers which were useful water in four countries from 1995 to 2018 in percentage. Overall, a cursory glance at the line graph is enough to make it more clear that even though the highest quality river water was country A, country D was witnessed the least clear water in the sea. With reference to country A and D, 96% water was noted by country A in 1995. However, country D was 84% usable water available in the same year. From 2000 to 2013, country A reported clean water still remain up to 97% approximately, but after 2013, decrement will be fall in 2018. In 2000, the high level percentage was country D in clarity of river, while before prediction country D was fluctuation between 2000 and 2013 for good quality river water. The bottom percentage will be noticed by 2018 in country D. With regard to country B and C, both country were exactly the same percentage in river clarity which was 94%. Nevertheless, country B water quality was slowly increased from 2000 to 2013. After that, in 2018 level of clean water will be decreased by country B. Country C, from 2000 to 2008 percentage of good water was dropped by 86%, whereas good quality water was improved the level in 2008, 2010, 2013 by country C and also in 2018, 96 percent will be expected by country C.
The
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
given
line graph depicts that the number of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rivers
which were useful
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
in four
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
countries
from 1995 to 2018 in percentage.

Overall
, a cursory glance at the line graph is
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
enough
to
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
make
it more
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
that
even though
the highest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
river
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
A,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
D
was witnessed
the least
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
in the sea.

With reference to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
A and D, 96%
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
was noted
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
A in 1995.
However
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
D was 84% usable
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
available in the same year. From 2000 to 2013,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
A reported clean
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
still
remain up to 97% approximately,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
after 2013, decrement will be fall in 2018. In 2000, the high level
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
D in clarity of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
river
, while
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
before
prediction
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
D was fluctuation between 2000 and 2013 for
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
river
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
. The bottom
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
will
be noticed
by 2018 in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
D.

With regard to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
B and C, both
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
were exactly the same
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
river
clarity which was 94%.
Nevertheless
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
B
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
was
slowly
increased from 2000 to 2013. After that, in 2018 level of clean
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
will
be decreased
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
B.
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Country
C, from 2000 to 2008
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
was dropped
by 86%, whereas
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
was
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
improved
the level in 2008, 2010, 2013 by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
C and
also
in 2018, 96 percent will be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
expected
by
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
country
C.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The diagram below shows the percentage of good quality water in four countries from 1995 to 2010. It also shows the prediction for 2018.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
239 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts