Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The bar chart show the percentage of stduents giving good ratings in different aspects of a university

The bar chart show the percentage of stduents giving good ratings in different aspects of a university GNGlo
The table illustrates the percentage of students assessing different features of a university. In general, the most preferred aspect of a university was print resources. Additionally, the rate of student votes for building/ teaching facility facilities remained unchanged. In 2000, The proportion of students who voted for technical quality stood at 65%. It was followed by the highest percentage of students who preferred print resources with 87%, whereas the figure for students who picked building/ teaching facilities occupied 77%. Meanwhile, 45% and 32% of students responded that they preferred electronic resources and range of modules offered respectively. In 2010 -a decade later, there was a marginal growth of 3% to 69% in the proportion of students giving good ratings for technical quality. At the same time, that for ranges of modules offered dropped slightly to 27 %. By contrast, the percentage of students who gave good rates for building/teaching facilities remained unchanged over the surveyd period (77%). While this university witnessed a sharp increase of 43% to 88% in the quantity of students voting good extends for electronic modules, the percentage of students’ satisfaction with print resources underwent a moderate rise to 88%.
The table illustrates the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
assessing
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
different
features of a university.
In general
, the most preferred aspect of a university was print resources.
Additionally
, the rate of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
student
votes for building/ teaching facility facilities remained unchanged.

In 2000, The proportion of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
voted for technical quality stood at 65%. It
was followed
by the highest
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
preferred print resources with 87%, whereas the figure for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
picked building/ teaching facilities occupied 77%.

Meanwhile, 45% and 32% of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
responded that they preferred electronic resources and range of modules offered
respectively
.

In 2010 -a decade later, there was a marginal growth of 3% to 69% in the proportion of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
giving
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
ratings for technical quality. At the same time, that for ranges of modules offered dropped
slightly
to 27 %. By contrast, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
who
gave
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
rates for building/teaching facilities remained unchanged over the
Possible spelling mistake found.
surveyd
period (77%). While this university witnessed a sharp increase of 43% to 88% in the quantity of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students
voting
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
good
extends for electronic modules, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
percentage
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
students’
satisfaction with print resources underwent a moderate rise to 88%.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The bar chart show the percentage of stduents giving good ratings in different aspects of a university

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
193 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The bar chart show the percentage of stduents giving good ratings in different aspects of a university