Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The bar chart is illustrating information about England’s rivers quality of water.

The bar chart is illustrating information about England’s rivers quality of water in a ten-year period started from 1993. It is clear from the chart, the length of rivers with each three level of quality of water, from poor to good, fluctuated in the mentioned period. In addition, from 1994, rivers with good quality of water, disproportionately had the larger share in the length among rivers in England, followed by Fair and poor. In contrast, in 1993, although rivers with fair quality of water were in majority with 12. 5 thousand km, the other two levels were following it with small margin at 12 thousand km for rivers with good quality, and 9. 5 thousand km for rivers with poor quality. Rivers with good quality of water were 18. 5 thousand km in 1994 and after a fluctuation, with a peak of 24 in 2001 and 2002, over next 9 years, in 2003 were 21 thousand km of England rivers. Simultaneously, rivers with fair and poor condition of water varied, in order, from 8 to 13, and between 2 and 4. 5 thousand km.
The bar chart is illustrating information about England’s
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rivers
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
in a ten-year period
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
started
from 1993.

It is
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
clear
from the chart, the length of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rivers
with each three level of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
, from poor to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
, fluctuated in the mentioned period.
In addition
, from 1994,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rivers
with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
,
disproportionately
had the larger share in the length among
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rivers
in England, followed by
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
Fair
and poor.

In contrast
, in 1993, although
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rivers
with
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
fair
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
were in majority with 12. 5 thousand km, the other two levels were following it with
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
small
margin at 12 thousand km for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rivers
with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
, and 9. 5 thousand km for
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rivers
with poor quality.

Rivers with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
good
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
quality
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
were 18. 5 thousand km in 1994 and after a fluctuation, with a peak of 24 in 2001 and 2002, over
next
9 years, in 2003 were 21 thousand km of England
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rivers
.
Simultaneously
,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
rivers
with
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
fair
and poor condition of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
water
varied, in order, from 8 to 13, and between 2 and 4. 5 thousand km.

IELTS academic The bar chart is illustrating information about England’s rivers quality of water.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
184 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The bar chart is illustrating information about England’s rivers quality of water.