Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The bar chart illustrates the incidence of recycling of four kinds of common materials discard

The bar chart illustrates the incidence of recycling of four kinds of common materials discard G3y1w
The bar chart illustrates the incidence of recycling of four kinds of common materials discarded by a city’s domestic residents at three equal intervals in the decade starting with 1992. The initial, 1992, recycling rate of all the four is roughly equal. The trend thenceforward is almost universally one of continued increase, with the final figures being higher by anything from a meager few percentage points for plastic to triple the starting number for glass. A more detailed analysis shows the beginning of the researched period with 10% of plastic refuse being recycled by households vs. 17% for aluminum cans. Paper and glass were almost level at about 15%. Five years later, in 1997, the foregoing figures went up in all the cases bar cans, which actually dropped 5%, to 12%. Plastic was recycled a smidge more than a half a decade prior (up 2% to 12%) but the incline was far more pronounced with paper and glass, which roughly doubled from their starting line of 15%: 32% for the former and to 28% for the latter. At the end of the period, another five years later, plastic was still being recycled the least (12%, just as in 1997) but the other three substances increased. Just under a fourth of cans were now recycled (24%, approximately double the 1997 figure) as well as every two out of five cans (38%) and almost a half reusable glass (48%).
The bar chart illustrates the incidence of recycling of four kinds of common materials discarded by a city’s domestic residents at three equal intervals in the decade starting with 1992. The initial, 1992, recycling rate of all the four is roughly equal.
The
trend thenceforward is almost
universally
one of continued increase, with the final figures being higher by anything from a meager few percentage points for
plastic
to triple the starting number for glass.

A more detailed analysis
shows
the beginning of the researched period with 10% of
plastic
refuse being
recycled
by households vs. 17% for aluminum
cans
. Paper and glass were almost level at about 15%. Five years later, in 1997, the foregoing figures went up in all the cases bar
cans
, which actually dropped 5%, to 12%.
Plastic
was
recycled
a
smidge
more than a half a decade prior (up 2% to 12%)
but
the incline was far more pronounced with paper and glass, which roughly doubled from their starting line of 15%: 32% for the former and to 28% for the latter.

At the
end
of the period, another five years later,
plastic
was
still
being
recycled
the least (12%,
just
as in 1997)
but
the other three substances increased.
Just
under a fourth of
cans
were
now
recycled
(24%, approximately double the 1997 figure)
as well
as every two out of five
cans
(38%) and almost a half reusable glass (48%).
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The bar chart illustrates the incidence of recycling of four kinds of common materials discard

Academic
  American English
3 paragraphs
237 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: