Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The bar chart details the amount of waste that was disposed via landfill, burning and dumping at sea, in a particular European country between 2005 and 2008.

The bar chart details the amount of waste that was disposed via landfill, burning and dumping at sea, in a particular European country between 2005 and 2008. Lb2Kr
The bar chart details the amount of waste that was disposed via landfill, burning and dumping at sea, in a particular European country between 2005 and 2008. Overall, it can be seen that while landfills initially were the main method of waste disposal and burning the least used method, the trend slowly reversed over the four-year period. In 2005, disposing of waste via landfill was significantly the most preferred method of disposal with 1800 million tonnes of trash being buried. The amount of trash dumped at sea was only a third of this, at 600 million tonnes, while the amount of trash that was burnt was around 500 million tonnes. In 2006 the amount of waste buried in landfills had reduced substantially by 600 million tonnes, to 1200, however the amount of waste that was burnt or disposed of at sea only increased by 50-100 million tonnes. In 2007, the waste the was buried and dumped at sea both dropped to about 900 and 600 million tonnes respectively, while the amount of trash burnt rose to around 700 million tonnes. By 2008, burning of waste was the preferred method of disposal, at 900 million tonnes, with landfill waste down to only 600 million tonnes, a third of the figure from four years earlier, and only approximately 550 million tonnes of waste dumped at sea.
The bar chart
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
details
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
that
was disposed
via
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
landfill
, burning and dumping at
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sea
, in a particular European country between 2005 and 2008.

Overall
, it can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
that while
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
landfills
initially
were the main
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
disposal and burning the least
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
used
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
, the trend
slowly
reversed over the four-year period.

In 2005, disposing of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
via
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
landfill
was
significantly
the most preferred
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
of disposal with 1800
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trash
being buried
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trash
dumped at
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sea
was
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
a third of this, at 600
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes, while the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trash
that
was burnt
was around 500
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes. In 2006 the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
buried in
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
landfills
had
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
reduced
substantially
by 600
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes, to 1200,
however
the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
that
was burnt
or disposed of at
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sea
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
increased by 50-100
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes.

In 2007, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
the
was buried
and dumped at
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sea
both dropped to about 900 and 600
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes
respectively
, while the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
amount
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
trash
burnt rose to around 700
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes. By 2008, burning of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
was the preferred
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
method
of disposal, at 900
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes, with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
landfill
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
down to
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
600
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes, a third of the figure from four years earlier, and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
only
approximately 550
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
tonnes of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
waste
dumped at
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
sea
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The bar chart details the amount of waste that was disposed via landfill, burning and dumping at sea, in a particular European country between 2005 and 2008.

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
224 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 7.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic:
  • The bar chart details the amount of waste that was disposed via landfill, burning and dumping at sea, in a particular European country between 2005 and 2008.