Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

t the average household expenditure in comparison between 1920 and 2000

t the average household expenditure in comparison between 1920 and 2000 OlWQ3

The pie charts illustrate informations about the average household expenditure in comparison between 1920 and 2000 in its econometric development. The initial impression is that the average money spent on food had decreased significantly from 71. 9 to 21. 8 percent. However, the spent money on recreation and other items had considerably increased from 7. 7 to 34. 2 percent. It can clearly be seen that people tend to spend less money in 2000 than 1920 on food. although citizens in 1920 were allocating less budget on recreation, they spent much more in 2000. Also costs on their leisure time such as traveling and communication had obvious growth from 3. 3 to 14. 3 percent. As the percentage of use of fuel and light and house goods in 2000 was remained the same as in 1920, it had slight decline about 0. 3 and 0. 1 percent. They had focused on medical care had increased over 80 years and reached 3. 9 from 1. 9 percent. Not only was housing and clothing increased, but also they had paid considerable attention on education as well in 2000 rather than 1920. In conclusion, there were lots of rises and drops over eighty years.

The pie charts illustrate The word 'informations' is a legal term. In standard English, the word 'information' is a non-count noun. Did you mean "information"?information
informations
 about the average household expenditure in comparison
 between 1920 and 2000 in its econometric development.

The initial impression is that the average money spent on food had decreased significantly
 from 71. 9 to 21. 8 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percent
. However
, the spent money on recreation and other items had considerably
 increased from 7. 7 to 34. 2 percent.

It can clearly
 be This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :witnessed
seen
 that This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 tend to spend less money in 2000 than 1920 on food. This sentence does not start with an uppercase letterAlthough
although
 citizens in 1920 were allocating less budget on recreation, they spent much more in 2000. Also
 costs on their leisure time such as traveling and communication had obvious growth from 3. 3 to 14. 3 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percent
. As the percentage of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exploit
use
 of fuel and light and This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :residence
house
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :productscommoditiesmerchandises
goods
 in 2000 was remained
 the same as in 1920, it had slight decline about 0. 3 and 0. 1 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percent
. They had focused on medical care had increased over 80 years and reached 3. 9 from 1. 9 You use this word too often, consider replacing it withfeeratiobonusproportionchunkrate
percent
. Not This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 was housing and clothing increased, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
also
 they had paid considerable attention on education as well
 in 2000 rather
 than 1920.

In conclusion
, there were lots of rises and drops over eighty years. 