Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

illustrates good ratings survey results in percentages

illustrates good ratings survey results in percentages Q2xk3
The table illustrates good ratings survey results in percentages on how students rated the different aspects of a university in the years 2000, 2005 and 2010. In general, electronic resources showed an upward trend over the years whereas range of modules offered had a downward trend. However, buildings/teaching facilities maintained a constant trend during the given time period. In the year 2000, print resources had the highest ratings at 84 percent which increased to 89% in 2005. Buildings/teaching facilities emerged second that year at 77%, although its ratings remained at 77% in the year 2005. Teaching quality came in third at 65% but dropped by 2% to 63% in 2005. Electronic resources started off at 45% and greatly improved to 72% in 2005. Last was range of modules offered at 32% which decreased upto 30% in 2005. In the year 2010, print resources and electronic resources had a tie at 88% although the former had dropped its rating by 1% while the latter improved by 16% in comparison to 2005. Buildings/teaching facilities emerged second at 77%, remaining constant over the years. Teaching quality scooped 69%, a 6% increase from the ratings in the year 2005. Range of modules offered came in last at 27% which was notably a drop from 2005' s ratings.
The table illustrates
good
ratings
survey results in percentages on how students rated the
different
aspects of a university in the years 2000, 2005 and 2010.

In general
, electronic resources
showed
an upward trend over the years whereas range of modules offered had a downward trend.
However
, buildings/teaching facilities maintained a constant trend during the
given
time period.

In the
year
2000, print resources had the highest
ratings
at 84 percent which increased to 89% in 2005. Buildings/teaching facilities emerged second that
year
at 77%, although its
ratings
remained at 77% in the
year
2005. Teaching quality came in third at 65%
but
dropped by 2% to 63% in 2005. Electronic resources
started
off at 45% and
greatly
improved
to 72% in 2005. Last was range of modules offered at 32% which decreased
upto
30% in 2005.

In the
year
2010, print resources and electronic resources had a tie at 88% although the former had dropped its
rating
by 1% while the latter
improved
by 16%
in comparison
to 2005. Buildings/teaching facilities emerged second at 77%, remaining constant over the years. Teaching quality scooped 69%, a 6% increase from the
ratings
in the
year
2005. Range of modules offered came in last at 27% which was
notably
a drop from 2005' s
ratings
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic illustrates good ratings survey results in percentages

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
213 words
6.5
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 6.5
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts





Get more results for topic: