Search
Tools
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

france and UK expenditure 2010

france and UK expenditure 2010 wO9YN

The bar chart illustrates France’s and UK’s expenditure on five different consumer goods - cars, computers, books, perfume and cameras in 2010. The expenditure is quantified in pounds sterling. Overall, the UK spent more money on consumer goods than France in the period. Cars have the highest expenditure level in both France and the UK in that year. Least amount of money was spent on perfume in the UK with cameras in France. Cameras are depicted to have the largest difference in both countries’ spending levels with a leap of around 200, 000 pounds. Conversely, computers are shown to have the most trivial difference of only 30, 000 pounds sterling between France and the UK. For cars, the British spent about 450, 000 pounds while the French only spent 400, 000 pounds. Similarly, for books, people in the UK spent around 400, 000 pounds while people in France spent 300, 000 pounds. In the UK, expenditure on cameras was over double that of France which was only 150, 000 pounds. On the other hand, computer expenditure in the UK was slightly lower than that of France, of above 350, 000 pounds and exactly 350, 000 pounds respectively. Both countries spent a minute amount on perfume, but France still accounts for a slightly higher spending of 200, 000 pounds when compared to the UK, with an expenditure level of almost 150, 000 pounds.

The bar chart illustrates France’s and UK’s You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditure
 on five This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:various
different
 consumer This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :productscommoditiesmerchandises
goods
Consider using an m-dash if you do not want to join two words.—
-
 cars, computers, books, perfume and You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcamcorder
cameras
 in 2010. The You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditure
is quantified
 in pounds sterling.

Overall
, the UK You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 more money on consumer This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :productscommoditiesmerchandises
goods
 than France in the period. Cars have the highest You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditure
 level in both France and the UK in that year. A determiner is probably missing here: "the Least".The Least
Least
 amount of money was You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 on perfume in the UK with You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcamcorder
cameras
 in France. You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcamcorder
Cameras
are depicted
 to have the largest difference in both countries’ spending levels with a leap of around 200, 000 pounds. Conversely
, computers are shown
 to have the most trivial difference of This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 30, 000 pounds sterling between France and the UK.

For cars, the British You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 about 450, 000 pounds while the French This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 400, 000 pounds. Similarly
, for books, This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 in the UK You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 around 400, 000 pounds while This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 in France You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 300, 000 pounds. In the UK, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditure
 on You use this word too often, consider replacing it withcamcorder
cameras
 was over double that of France which was This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :exclusively
only
 150, 000 pounds.

On the other hand
, computer You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditure
 in the UK was slightly
 lower than that of France, of above 350, 000 pounds and exactly 350, 000 pounds respectively
. Both countries You use this word too often, consider replacing it withwastedfinisheduseddeadlost
spent
 a minute amount on perfume, This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 France still
 accounts for a slightly
 higher spending of 200, 000 pounds when compared to the UK, with an You use this word too often, consider replacing it withdisbursementoutlayfigureconsumptionpricerate
expenditure
 level of almost 150, 000 pounds. 