The line graph compares the percentages of staff instructed by four different companies between 2003 and 2006, a period of 3 years. In overall, the number of staff trained by companies A, B and C fluctuated steadily over the period, whereas the amount gained by company D increased considerablely. At the start of the period, the most outstanding representative in terms of training employees was company B, about 28 %. This was a little higher than company D, which was began at around 20% then significantly fell to about 17% in 2004 before seeing a doubling in 2006. Besides, the staff figure of company C significantly climbed from 25% in 2003 to 36% in 2004, reached the top of the whole season. During this time, 2 companies A and B remained stable with a data difference of about 1% to 3%. From 2004 to 2005, both 3 companies A, B and C saw a small decline whilst company D rose sharply, about 15%. In the last year of the season, all these companies gave a gradual rise in terms of training employees. Overall, the graph highlights a considerable difference between the fluctuation of 3 companies A, B and C but increase in company D' instructed employees
The line graph compares the percentages of staff instructed by four
different
companies
between 2003 and 2006, a period of 3 years. In
overall
, the number of staff trained by
companies
A, B and C fluctuated
steadily
over the period, whereas the amount gained by
company
D increased
considerablely
. At the
start
of the period, the most outstanding representative in terms of training employees was
company
B, about 28 %. This was a
little
higher than
company
D, which was
began
at around 20% then
significantly
fell to about 17% in 2004
before
seeing a doubling in 2006.
Besides
, the staff figure of
company
C
significantly
climbed from 25% in 2003 to 36% in 2004, reached the top of the whole season. During this time, 2
companies
A and B remained stable with a data difference of about 1% to 3%. From 2004 to 2005, both 3
companies
A, B and C
saw
a
small
decline whilst
company
D rose
sharply
, about 15%. In the last year of the season, all these
companies
gave a gradual rise in terms of training employees.
Overall
, the graph highlights a considerable difference between the fluctuation of 3
companies
A, B and C
but
increase in
company
D' instructed employees