Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

cutting tools in stone age

cutting tools in stone age n1dkP
The diagram illustrates the evolution of Stone Age cutting tools between 1. 4 million years ago and 0. 8 million years ago. The cutting tool at 1. 4 million years ago was made of stone and it had a height of approximately 8cm, a width and a length of approximately 2cm and 4cm respectively. From the front view and the back view, the surface of the tool was extremely rough and the shape of the front face didn’t resemble to that of the back face. In addition, the area of the front face was larger than that of the back face. From the side view, the edge was not too sharp. The cutting tool at 0. 8 million years ago was an advanced version of the old tool with approximately 11cm high, approximately 6cm and 2cm long and wide respectively. Apparently, the total size of the cutting tool increased considerably. From the front view and the back view, the surface of the tool was flatter than that of the tool at 1. 4 million years ago; , it was shaped like a droplet and had a pointy top. Besides, areas of the front face and back face were relatively equal. From the side view, the thickness of the tool stayed unchanged but the edge was sharper than that of the cutting tool at 1. 4 million years ago. Overall, there was a big innovation in size and shape of Stone Age cutting tools.
The diagram illustrates the evolution of Stone Age
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cutting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tools
between 1. 4
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
years ago and 0. 8
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
years ago.

The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cutting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tool
at 1. 4
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
years ago
was made
of stone and it had a height of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
approximately
Insert a space between the numerical value and the unit symbol "8 cm"
8cm
, a width and a length of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
approximately
Insert a space between the numerical value and the unit symbol "2 cm"
2cm
and
Insert a space between the numerical value and the unit symbol "4 cm"
4cm
respectively
. From the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
front
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
view
and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
back
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
view
, the surface of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tool
was
extremely
rough and the shape of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
front
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
didn’t resemble to that of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
back
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
.
In addition
, the area of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
front
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
was larger than that of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
back
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
. From the side
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
view
, the edge was not too sharp.

The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cutting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tool
at 0. 8
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
years ago was an advanced version of the
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
old
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tool
with
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
approximately
Insert a space between the numerical value and the unit symbol "11 cm"
11cm
high,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
approximately
Insert a space between the numerical value and the unit symbol "6 cm"
6cm
and
Insert a space between the numerical value and the unit symbol "2 cm"
2cm
long and wide
respectively
.
Apparently
, the total size of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cutting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tool
increased
considerably
. From the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
front
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
view
and the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
back
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
view
, the surface of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tool
was flatter than that of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tool
at 1. 4
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
years ago;
Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
,
it
was shaped
like a droplet and had a pointy top.
Besides
, areas of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
front
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
back
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
face
were
relatively
equal. From the side
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
view
, the thickness of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tool
stayed unchanged
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
the edge was sharper than that of the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cutting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tool
at 1. 4
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
million
years ago.

Overall
, there was a
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
big
innovation in size and shape of Stone Age
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
cutting
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
tools
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic cutting tools in stone age

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
243 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 6.0
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 5.5
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts