Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.
Check Your Text it's free

The line graph compares the average intake in a nation in Europe between 1979 and 2004 of fish and three kinds of meat namely chicken, lamb and beef

The line graph compares the average intake in a nation in Europe between 1979 and 2004 of fish and three kinds of meat namely chicken, lamb and beef B7Yew
The line graph compares the average intake in a nation in Europe between 1979 and 2004 of fish and three kinds of meat namely chicken, lamb and beef As can be seen from the graph, the amount of chicken consumed throughout the period witnessed an upward trend, whereas beef and lamb had a significant decreasing tendency. In addition, the line for fishes gradually went down but not as much as beef and lamb. In 1979, Beef was by far the most prevalent kind of food, started at around 220 grams per person per week. Despite reached a peak at about 240 grams, the figures then fell sharply to just over 100 grams at the end of the period. Similarly, the consumption of lamb began at 150 grams per person per week. The figure then steady fell and reached only over 50 grams in the year 2004. The consumption of fish also declined, but much less remarkably to just below 50 grams, so although it remained the least popular food, consumption levels were the most stable in contrast, Chicken was the third most eaten meat in 1979, averaging fewer than 150 grams per person per week. The consumption of chicken showed an upward trend over a 25 - year period, overtaking that of lamb in1980 and that of beef in 1989. By 2004 it had soared to almost 250 grams per person per week.
The line graph compares the average intake in a nation in Europe between 1979 and 2004 of fish and three kinds of meat
namely
chicken,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lamb
and beef

As can be
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
seen
from the graph, the amount of chicken consumed throughout the period witnessed an upward trend, whereas
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
beef
and
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lamb
had a significant decreasing tendency.
In addition
, the line for fishes
gradually
went down
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
not as much as
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
beef
and lamb.

In 1979,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
Beef
was by far the most prevalent kind of food,
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
started
at around 220
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
per
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
per
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
week
. Despite reached a peak at about 240
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
, the figures then fell
sharply
to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
over 100
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
at the
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
end
of the period.
Similarly
, the
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lamb
began at 150
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
per
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
per
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
week
. The figure then steady fell and reached
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
only
over 50
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
in the year 2004. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
of fish
also
declined,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
but
much less
remarkably
to
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
just
below 50
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
,
This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:
so
although it remained the least popular food,
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
levels were the most
Please add a punctuation mark at the end of paragraph
stable


This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
in
contrast, Chicken was the third most eaten meat in 1979, averaging fewer than 150
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
per
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
per
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
week
. The
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
consumption
of chicken
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :
showed
an upward trend over a 25
Consider using an m-dash if you do not want to join two words.
-
year period, overtaking that of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
lamb
in1980 and that of
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
beef
in 1989. By 2004 it had soared to almost 250
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
grams
per
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
person
per
You use this word too often, consider replacing it with
week
.
What do you think?
  • This is funny writingFunny
  • I love this writingLove
  • This writing has blown my mindWow
  • It made me angryAngry
  • It made me sadSad

IELTS academic The line graph compares the average intake in a nation in Europe between 1979 and 2004 of fish and three kinds of meat namely chicken, lamb and beef

Academic
  American English
4 paragraphs
233 words
6.0
Overall Band Score
Coherence and Cohesion: 7.0
  • Structure your answers in logical paragraphs
  • ?
    One main idea per paragraph
  • ?
    Include an introduction and conclusion
  • ?
    Support main points with an explanation and then an example
  • Use cohesive linking words accurately and appropriately
  • ?
    Vary your linking phrases using synonyms
Lexical Resource: 5.5
  • Try to vary your vocabulary using accurate synonyms
  • Use less common question specific words that accurately convey meaning
  • Check your work for spelling and word formation mistakes
Grammatical Range: 6.0
  • Use a variety of complex and simple sentences
  • Check your writing for errors
Task Achievement: 5.0
  • Answer all parts of the question
  • ?
    Present relevant ideas
  • Fully explain these ideas
  • ?
    Support ideas with relevant, specific examples
Labels Descriptions
  • ?
    Currently is not available
  • Meet the criteria
  • Doesn't meet the criteria
Recent posts