Search
Vocabularying
Listening
Reading
1. Academic
2. General
Writing
1. IELTSWriting Checker
2. IELTS Writing Samples
Speaking
1. Latest Topics
2. Speaking Club

Do you want to improve your writing? Try our new evaluation service and get detailed feedback.

Compare expenses in American people in 1996 and 1966.

Compare expenses in American people in 1996 and 1966. ndJVe

The pie chart compare to the expenditure of US people in two varriuos catagories which are food, cars, petrol reastaurant, furniture, computer, book. Overall, it is clear that the highest amount went spending on cars in 1996 and food in 1966. Moreover, computer and books were spending the lowest amount by citizens in both years. In detail, The American people spending 45% amount on cars in 1996 burly this spending ratio reached 23% in 1966. In 1966, spending on restaurants more amount than 1996, respectively 7 percent and 14%. The proportion of spending of food fell 44% in 1966 to 14% in 1996. On computer expenses was on 1% in 1966 but in 1996, remarkable 10 percent increase of spending on computer by the American people. Furthermore, the us people spending 9% amount on petrol owing to the fact that not large amount of petrol expenses compared to the 1996.

The pie chart compare to the expenditure of US This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
 in two Possible spelling mistake found.variousbarrios
varriuos
Possible spelling mistake found.categories
catagories
 which are food, cars, petrol Possible spelling mistake found.restaurant
reastaurant
, furniture, computer, book.

Overall
, it is This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :apparent
clear
 that the highest You use this word too often, consider replacing it withloadbulkextentsupplychunknumber
amount
 went You use this word too often, consider replacing it withusewasteconsumegiveinvestcontribute
spending
 on cars in 1996 and food in 1966. Moreover
, computer and books were You use this word too often, consider replacing it withusewasteconsumegiveinvestcontribute
spending
 the lowest You use this word too often, consider replacing it withloadbulkextentsupplychunknumber
amount
 by citizens in both years.

In detail, The American This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withusewasteconsumegiveinvestcontribute
spending
 45% You use this word too often, consider replacing it withloadbulkextentsupplychunknumber
amount
 on cars in 1996 burly this You use this word too often, consider replacing it withusewasteconsumegiveinvestcontribute
spending
 ratio reached 23% in 1966. In 1966, You use this word too often, consider replacing it withusewasteconsumegiveinvestcontribute
spending
 on restaurants more You use this word too often, consider replacing it withloadbulkextentsupplychunknumber
amount
 than 1996, respectively
 7 percent and 14%. The proportion of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withusewasteconsumegiveinvestcontribute
spending
 of food fell 44% in 1966 to 14% in 1996. On computer expenses was on 1% in 1966 This phrase/word is too simple and can be replaced with:on the contrary
but
 in 1996, remarkable 10 percent increase of You use this word too often, consider replacing it withusewasteconsumegiveinvestcontribute
spending
 on computer by the American This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
.

Furthermore
, Possible typo. Did you mean "the" or "us"?theus
the us
This phrase/word (depending on the context) can be potentially replaced with :individualsnationsociety
people
You use this word too often, consider replacing it withusewasteconsumegiveinvestcontribute
spending
 9% You use this word too often, consider replacing it withloadbulkextentsupplychunknumber
amount
 on petrol owing to the fact that not large You use this word too often, consider replacing it withloadbulkextentsupplychunknumber
amount
 of petrol expenses compared to the 1996. 