chart 1 shows price of the computer tablets in different stores and the discount offers. The second chart shows the sales achived by each dept while promotion period. The last chart shows how much money spent on tv adverts during sales period.
chart 1 shows price of the computer tablets in different stores and the discount offers. The second chart shows the sales achived by each dept while promotion period. The last chart shows how much money spent on tv adverts during sales period. KVqD9
The charts show sales prices of computer tablets, discounts offering during the promotional period, generation of sales during promotions, as well as the television advertisement cost expenses. Sales are measured in USD and percentages.
According to the first table Nova has received the highest price per tablets (USD 565), as well as the top discount rate of 25%. In contrast, Smith's sales price being the lowest -usd 180- has only 5% discount facility. The other locations remain the discount rate at 10%.
Regarding the second bar graph, which shows the number of sales have increased significantly in Nova at about 23%: meanwhile, Lewis is the second largest out of others, the rest of the store sales remain below 15%. However, smith's sales records as the least income revenue creator, below 5%.
Turning to the final table of advertisements on television, it is evident that no advertising spent against Smith, as its lowest performance on sales. However, those who received income below 15%, has received the major shares of promotions via adverts. In contrast, Nova and Lewis, being the top generators of higher profits, allocated lesser advertising cost, which is as twice lower than the other locations,
Overall, both Nova and Lewis have illustrated major features of having higher discounting facility which has made stronger income generation whereby Smith has shown the reversal approach. Furthermore, it is noted that the lower the sales, the more advertising cost it may well be.
The charts
show
sales
prices of computer tablets,
discounts
offering during the promotional period, generation of
sales
during promotions,
as well
as the television advertisement cost expenses.
Sales
are measured
in USD and percentages.
According to the
first
table
Nova
has received the highest price per tablets (USD 565),
as well
as the top
discount
rate of 25%.
In contrast
, Smith's
sales
price being the lowest
-usd
180- has
only
5%
discount
facility. The other locations remain the
discount
rate at 10%.
Regarding the second bar graph, which
shows
the number of
sales
have increased
significantly
in
Nova
at about 23%: meanwhile, Lewis is the second largest out of others, the rest of the store
sales
remain below 15%.
However
, smith's
sales
records as the least income revenue creator, below 5%.
Turning to the final table of advertisements on television, it is evident that no advertising spent against Smith, as its lowest performance on
sales
.
However
, those who received income below 15%, has received the major shares of promotions via adverts.
In contrast
,
Nova
and Lewis, being the top generators of higher profits, allocated lesser advertising cost, which is as twice lower than the other locations,
Overall
, both
Nova
and Lewis have illustrated major features of having higher discounting facility which has made stronger income generation whereby Smith has shown the reversal approach.
Furthermore
, it
is noted
that the lower the
sales
, the more advertising cost it may well be.