The statements is a report that appeared in the newsletter of the West Meria Public Health Council. They claim that an innovative treatment has come to our attention that promises to significantly reduce absenteeism in schools and workplaces. There are so many reasons in the following statement.
First of all, the statement claims that people living in nearby East Meria, where fish consumption is very high and it means they eat more fish. Although fish have very high consumption, it cannot prove they are all eaten by people from East Meira. It might be that these people from East Maira always made them and sold them to other places, even if they like to give fish as a gift. We need more evidence to prove this opinion. It concluded that people visit the doctor only once or twice per year for the treatment of colds. It cannot prove that people from East Meira meet less doctors because they always eat fish. We need some evidence to prove that people from East Meria are less likely to meet doctors because they are less likely to have less sickness. They might eat some medicine at home or they are very poor even if they don't have any money to meet a doctor. It does not mean they have a healthy body. We also need more evidence to prove that these people only eat fish. They may also eat vegetables and always exercise so their body is very healthy.
Secondly, the statement claims that since colds represent the post frequently given reason for absences from school and work. We need more evidences to ensure these reasons are true. Usually due to some reasons people will write a fake reason. Some people are true and others are false. So we must prove it is true.
Finally, this statement claims that they recommend the daily use of a nutritional supplement derived from fish oil as a good way to prevent colds and lower absenteeism. We need to know this fish oil can prevent colds and lower absenteeism. Maybe due to the diel there is a considerable difference and it does not work.
The
statements
is
a report that appeared in the newsletter of the West
Meria
Public Health Council. They
claim
that an innovative treatment has
come
to our attention that promises to
significantly
reduce
absenteeism in schools and workplaces. There are
so
many
reasons
in the following statement.
First of all
, the
statement
claims
that
people
living in nearby East
Meria
, where fish consumption is
very
high and it means they
eat
more fish. Although fish have
very
high consumption, it cannot
prove
they are all eaten by
people
from East
Meira
. It might be that these
people
from East
Maira
always made them and sold them to other places, even if they like to give fish as a gift. We
need
more
evidence
to
prove
this opinion.
It concluded
that
people
visit the
doctor
only
once or twice per year for the treatment of
colds
. It cannot
prove
that
people
from East
Meira
meet
less
doctors
because
they always
eat
fish. We
need
some
evidence
to
prove
that
people
from East
Meria
are
less
likely to
meet
doctors
because
they are
less
likely to have
less
sickness. They might
eat
some
medicine at
home or
they are
very
poor even if they don't have any money to
meet
a
doctor
. It does not mean they have a healthy body. We
also
need
more
evidence
to
prove
that these
people
only
eat
fish. They may
also
eat
vegetables and always exercise
so
their body is
very
healthy.
Secondly
, the
statement
claims
that since
colds
represent the post
frequently
given
reason
for absences from school and work. We
need
more
evidences
to ensure these
reasons
are true.
Usually
due to
some
reasons
people
will write a fake
reason
.
Some
people
are true
and others
are false.
So
we
must
prove
it is true.
Finally
, this
statement
claims
that they recommend the daily
use
of a nutritional supplement derived from fish oil as a
good
way to
prevent
colds
and lower absenteeism. We
need
to know this fish oil can
prevent
colds
and lower absenteeism. Maybe due to the
diel
there is a considerable difference and it does not work.