In the letter to the editor, the author concludes that the West Lansburg Council should not allow the roads to be built along the coastal wetlands. As it can be seen that the tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of the West Lansburg, it is very important that the area is protected and reserved.
The author bases his conclusion by comparing results with Neighboring Eastern Carpenteria, which had a similar sanctuary. However, the sanctuary status was repealed in 1978 due to which constructions were allowed, which in turn harmed the aquatic life of the sea. Hence, the author thinks that the same would result in West Lansburg and hence, doesn’t want the road to be built. It is very important that the condition of Neighboring Eastern Carpenteria must be examined before jumping to conclusions. The author must not be aware of a number of other reasons for the depletion of aquatic life in that area.
Firstly, the author assumes that decrease of the population of the sea was because of the repeal of its sanctuary status. The author nowhere mentions that the new status involves building of roads which would actually affect the wildlife.
Secondly, the author doesn’t find out the actual reasons for the reducing number of the groundhog. As it is mentioned that the number was once in millions, it is very important to find out the actual reason behind the falling figures. Measures must be taken with respect to the actual reasons of the falling numbers.
Also, the author nowhere mentions that how the construction of the road along the coastline would affect the groundhog. As long as the construction of the roads doesn’t harm its natural habitat and the coastline is not destroyed by its construction, it would be good enough to construct roads.
Hence, it is necessary for the author to gets the fact right before concluding the entire discussion on general information.
In the letter to the editor, the
author
concludes that the West
Lansburg
Council should not
allow
the
roads
to
be built
along the coastal wetlands. As it can be
seen
that the tufted groundhog
lives
in the coastal wetlands of the West
Lansburg
, it is
very
important
that the area
is protected
and reserved.
The
author
bases his conclusion by comparing results with Neighboring Eastern
Carpenteria
, which had a similar sanctuary.
However
, the sanctuary status
was repealed
in 1978 due to which
constructions
were
allowed
, which in turn harmed the aquatic life of the sea.
Hence
, the
author
thinks
that the same would result in West
Lansburg
and
hence
, doesn’t want the
road
to
be built
. It is
very
important
that the condition of Neighboring Eastern
Carpenteria
must
be examined
before
jumping to conclusions. The
author
must
not be aware of a number of other
reasons
for the depletion of aquatic life in that area.
Firstly
, the
author
assumes that decrease of the population of the sea was
because
of the repeal of its sanctuary status. The
author
nowhere mentions that the new status involves building of
roads
which would actually affect the wildlife.
Secondly
, the
author
doesn’t find out the actual
reasons
for the reducing number of the groundhog. As it
is mentioned
that the number was once in millions, it is
very
important
to find out the actual
reason
behind the falling figures. Measures
must
be taken
with respect to the actual
reasons
of the falling numbers.
Also
, the
author
nowhere mentions that how the
construction
of the
road
along the coastline would affect the groundhog. As long as the
construction
of the
roads
doesn’t harm its natural habitat and the coastline is not
destroyed
by its
construction
, it would be
good
enough
to construct roads.
Hence
, it is necessary for the
author
to
gets
the fact right
before
concluding the entire discussion on general information.