Food plays a very important part in overall development during a child's growth as well as adults. The argument states that, since the inception of Swift Nutrition students have been reluctant to eat food at the cafeteria which will eventually gender negative effects to the health of Kensington students.
Before Swift Nutrition was awarded the contract, parents did not face any complaints from the students about the cafeteria. Most of the students did not carry lunch boxes. But since a year, after Swift Nutrition took over, there has been a rise in the demand of lunch boxes. On talking with other parents, the mentioned reasons were concluded. Also it has come to attention, most of the students have lost weight in this one year which was not previously observed. Is this weight loss a cause due to change in cafeteria vendor? If, the answer is yes, then it is definitely reasonable to demand a change in vendor, in absence of which, the health of the students will suffer.
What is the geographical location of the Kensington Academy? What is the diet pattern of its habitat? The answers to this question can help better evaluate the argument. If it so happens that Kensington Academy is located at a place where it mostly snows throughout the year and where the diet followed happens to be of high fat, high calorie and high protein, then the basis of this argument seems reasonable. A high fat, high calorie diet of the habitats is essential to overcome and survive the cold weather conditions. Also a drastic change in the staple diet will naturally induce feelings of discontent in the new foodstuffs. Ultimately, he children will refrain from eating the new diet. Loss in food consumption is definitely hurt the child's health and thus a demand for change in vendor should be accepted.
Food plays a
very
important
part in
overall
development during a child's growth
as well
as adults. The argument states that, since the inception of Swift Nutrition
students
have been reluctant to eat food at the cafeteria which will
eventually
gender
negative
effects to the health of Kensington students.
Before
Swift Nutrition
was awarded
the contract, parents did not face any complaints from the
students
about the cafeteria. Most of the
students
did not carry lunch boxes.
But
since a year, after Swift Nutrition took over, there has been a rise in the demand of lunch boxes. On talking with other parents, the mentioned reasons
were concluded
.
Also
it has
come
to attention, most of the
students
have lost weight in this one year which was not previously observed. Is this weight loss a cause due to
change
in cafeteria vendor? If, the answer is yes, then it is definitely reasonable to demand a
change
in vendor, in absence of which, the health of the
students
will suffer.
What is the geographical location of the Kensington Academy? What is the diet pattern of its habitat? The answers to this question can
help
better evaluate the argument. If it
so
happens that Kensington Academy
is located
at a place where it
mostly
snows throughout the year and where the diet followed happens to be of
high
fat
,
high
calorie and
high
protein, then the basis of this argument seems reasonable. A
high
fat
,
high
calorie diet of the habitats is essential to overcome and survive the
cold
weather conditions.
Also
a drastic
change
in the staple diet will
naturally
induce feelings of discontent in the new foodstuffs.
Ultimately
,
he children
will refrain from eating the new diet. Loss in food consumption is definitely hurt the child's health and
thus
a demand for
change
in vendor should be
accepted
.